<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: Angiodynamics v. Biolitec	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/09/update-angiodynamics-v-biolitec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/09/update-angiodynamics-v-biolitec/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:23:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: AngioDynamics v. Biolitec &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/09/update-angiodynamics-v-biolitec/#comment-22766</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: AngioDynamics v. Biolitec &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=20065#comment-22766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] First Circuit affirmed the injunction and (for the most part) the sanction for the kinds of reasons suggested in the oral argument. In short, Neuberger and Biolitec had admitted that they could reverse the merger, so they can [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] First Circuit affirmed the injunction and (for the most part) the sanction for the kinds of reasons suggested in the oral argument. In short, Neuberger and Biolitec had admitted that they could reverse the merger, so they can [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
