Comments on: Case of the Day: ISPEC, Inc. v. Tex R.L. Industrial, Inc. https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/09/11/case-day-ispec-inc-v-tex-r-l-industrial-inc/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:03:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Ted Folkman https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/09/11/case-day-ispec-inc-v-tex-r-l-industrial-inc/#comment-2022 Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:03:21 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=18760#comment-2022 In reply to Jungsup Kim.

Thank you for the comment. Why not try service by Fedex again, but with the clerk transmitting the documents? Or else why not bring a motion under FRCP 4(f)(3) for leave to serve by Fedex or by mail without requiring the documents to be sent by the clerk? There seem to be options here.

]]> By: Jungsup Kim https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/09/11/case-day-ispec-inc-v-tex-r-l-industrial-inc/#comment-2021 Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:33:36 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=18760#comment-2021 I am an attorney for the plaintiff, ISPEC, Inc. Theoretically it’s easy to say the service method should have been the foreign mailing by Clerk of Court pursuant to the FRCP rules, but practically it is extremely tough because U.S. registered mail service with return receipt is not available in Taiwan. Therefore, letter rogatory seems to be only way to resolve the inefficiency of service matter, but it is extremely expensive and time-consuming. By the way, now plaintiff is trying to re-serve by using every possible service methods under the permission of the Court. See what happens. …

]]>