<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: BBK Tobacco &#038; Foods v. Juicy eJuice	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/05/28/case-day-bbk-tobacco-foods-v-juicy-ejuice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/05/28/case-day-bbk-tobacco-foods-v-juicy-ejuice/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:34:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Zamora v. JP Morgan Chase Bank &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/05/28/case-day-bbk-tobacco-foods-v-juicy-ejuice/#comment-22458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Zamora v. JP Morgan Chase Bank &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=18227#comment-22458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] like to refer back to a 2014 post that draws out a possible implication of the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent reminder that the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] like to refer back to a 2014 post that draws out a possible implication of the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent reminder that the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund v. Coleridge Fine Arts &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/05/28/case-day-bbk-tobacco-foods-v-juicy-ejuice/#comment-1916</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund v. Coleridge Fine Arts &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=18227#comment-1916</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] international agreement allows but does not specify other means.&#8221; For the reasons I gave in a post back in May 2014, I think it&#8217;s possible to read FRCP 4(f)(2) in such a way that it never [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] international agreement allows but does not specify other means.&#8221; For the reasons I gave in a post back in May 2014, I think it&#8217;s possible to read FRCP 4(f)(2) in such a way that it never [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
