<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Bidonthecity.com LLC v. Halverston Holdings Ltd.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/05/13/case-day-bidonthecity-com-llc-v-halverston-holdings-ltd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/05/13/case-day-bidonthecity-com-llc-v-halverston-holdings-ltd/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Smith v. Wolf Performance Ammunition &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/05/13/case-day-bidonthecity-com-llc-v-halverston-holdings-ltd/#comment-1845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Smith v. Wolf Performance Ammunition &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17981#comment-1845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] service under Article 10 of the Convention.  Long-time readers know my views on this question. See this post for a brief discussion of the implications of Russia&#8217;s refusal to execute US requests for [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] service under Article 10 of the Convention.  Long-time readers know my views on this question. See this post for a brief discussion of the implications of Russia&#8217;s refusal to execute US requests for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Calista Enterprises v. Tenza Trading &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/05/13/case-day-bidonthecity-com-llc-v-halverston-holdings-ltd/#comment-1844</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Calista Enterprises v. Tenza Trading &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17981#comment-1844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] There were two interesting points in the decision. The judge hinted that service by mail in Russia might not be forbidden by the Convention in light of Russia&#8217;s unilateral refusal to execute requests for service of process from the United States. I&#8217;ve noted this point before: [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There were two interesting points in the decision. The judge hinted that service by mail in Russia might not be forbidden by the Convention in light of Russia&#8217;s unilateral refusal to execute requests for service of process from the United States. I&#8217;ve noted this point before: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
