<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Barot v. Embassy of Zambia	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Barot v. Zambia &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Barot v. Zambia &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 13:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] day is Barot v. Embassy of the Republic of Zambia (D.C. Cir. 2015). I first wrote about the case in April 2014. The question in the case was whether dismissal was proper for failure to comply with the service [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] day is Barot v. Embassy of the Republic of Zambia (D.C. Cir. 2015). I first wrote about the case in April 2014. The question in the case was whether dismissal was proper for failure to comply with the service [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 11:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1832&quot;&gt;dolores&lt;/a&gt;.

Congratulations to you and your lawyer! I have written a new post about last week&#039;s decision.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1832">dolores</a>.</p>
<p>Congratulations to you and your lawyer! I have written a new post about last week&#8217;s decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dolores		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dolores]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 02:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Atty.  I WON my appeal.  See Opinion below:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge: 
Dolores Barot appeals the dismissal of her complaint for failure to effect service of process as required under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1608(a)(3). That  act confers upon the district court responsibilities with regard to the sensitive task of service of process on a foreign government, yet in this case the district court itself was responsible for a substantial portion of the mistakes in service. Because Barot’s attempts at service came so close to strict compliance with the Act as to demonstrate a good faith effort at timely compliance amidst the sometimes confusing directions from the district court, we conclude, in view of the resulting prejudice to Barot and the absence of any relevant prejudice to the Embassy of Zambia of allowing a further effort at service, that dismissal was too extreme a remedy. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the case for the district court to permit Barot to effect service in compliance with section 1608(a)(3).&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Atty.  I WON my appeal.  See Opinion below:</p>
<blockquote><p>Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.<br />
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:<br />
Dolores Barot appeals the dismissal of her complaint for failure to effect service of process as required under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1608(a)(3). That  act confers upon the district court responsibilities with regard to the sensitive task of service of process on a foreign government, yet in this case the district court itself was responsible for a substantial portion of the mistakes in service. Because Barot’s attempts at service came so close to strict compliance with the Act as to demonstrate a good faith effort at timely compliance amidst the sometimes confusing directions from the district court, we conclude, in view of the resulting prejudice to Barot and the absence of any relevant prejudice to the Embassy of Zambia of allowing a further effort at service, that dismissal was too extreme a remedy. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the case for the district court to permit Barot to effect service in compliance with section 1608(a)(3).</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dolores		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dolores]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2015 00:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another Court recording of the Oral Argument for 

Dolores Barot v. Embassy of Zambia
Case 14-7081
Argued March 16, 2015

http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/recordings/...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Court recording of the Oral Argument for </p>
<p>Dolores Barot v. Embassy of Zambia<br />
Case 14-7081<br />
Argued March 16, 2015</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/recordings/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/recordings/</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dolores		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1830</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dolores]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 23:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1829&quot;&gt;dolores&lt;/a&gt;.

To hear the oral argument, please go to this:
https://www.courtlistener.com/audio/11730/dolores-barot-v-embassy-of-zambia/
The Oral Argument for
Dolores Barot v. Embassy of Zambia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Argued: March 16th, 2015
Duration: 33:24
Docket Number: 14-7081
Judges: Rogers, Millett, Sentelle]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1829">dolores</a>.</p>
<p>To hear the oral argument, please go to this:<br />
<a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/audio/11730/dolores-barot-v-embassy-of-zambia/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.courtlistener.com/audio/11730/dolores-barot-v-embassy-of-zambia/</a><br />
The Oral Argument for<br />
Dolores Barot v. Embassy of Zambia<br />
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit<br />
Date Argued: March 16th, 2015<br />
Duration: 33:24<br />
Docket Number: 14-7081<br />
Judges: Rogers, Millett, Sentelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dolores		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1829</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dolores]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Oral  Argument for 
Dolores Barot v. Embassy of Zambia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Argued: March 16th, 2015
Duration: 33:24
Docket Number: 14-7081
Judges: Rogers, Millett, Sentelle 

The Oral argument is now in the Internet.  If you are interested to hear just google Barot v. Embassy of Zambia and you can download it.  Thank you so much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oral  Argument for<br />
Dolores Barot v. Embassy of Zambia<br />
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit<br />
Date Argued: March 16th, 2015<br />
Duration: 33:24<br />
Docket Number: 14-7081<br />
Judges: Rogers, Millett, Sentelle </p>
<p>The Oral argument is now in the Internet.  If you are interested to hear just google Barot v. Embassy of Zambia and you can download it.  Thank you so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dolores		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1828</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dolores]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1828</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Oral Argument in connection with my appeal has been heard this afternoon.  The Decision of the Court of Appeals would be worth waiting for.  I am confident that Justice would be served.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oral Argument in connection with my appeal has been heard this afternoon.  The Decision of the Court of Appeals would be worth waiting for.  I am confident that Justice would be served.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dolores		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1827</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dolores]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1803&quot;&gt;Dolores Barot&lt;/a&gt;.

The dhl waybill label reads:  Contact Min. Foreign Affairs of Embassy of Zambia.  If you would consult a dictionary, Contact means/refers to a person therefore, Min. Foreign Affairs,  Embassy of Zambia, refers/connotes to MINISTER.  The label has no enough space for the whole addressee name Head of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Embassy of Zambia.  
The computer generated  dhl label  reads a part of the whole addressee name on the right side of the label  the name Contact (a person) Min Foreign Affairs and the computer automatically moved the other  portion of the addressee name Embassy of Zambia that was cut from the Min. of Foreign Affairs to the left side of the label next to the word To.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1803">Dolores Barot</a>.</p>
<p>The dhl waybill label reads:  Contact Min. Foreign Affairs of Embassy of Zambia.  If you would consult a dictionary, Contact means/refers to a person therefore, Min. Foreign Affairs,  Embassy of Zambia, refers/connotes to MINISTER.  The label has no enough space for the whole addressee name Head of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Embassy of Zambia.<br />
The computer generated  dhl label  reads a part of the whole addressee name on the right side of the label  the name Contact (a person) Min Foreign Affairs and the computer automatically moved the other  portion of the addressee name Embassy of Zambia that was cut from the Min. of Foreign Affairs to the left side of the label next to the word To.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dolor Barot		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1826</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dolor Barot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 21:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1816&quot;&gt;Ted Folkman&lt;/a&gt;.

Dear Atty.

I am now convinced that you:are 100 percent correct  that it is  hard to get a good/knowledgeable lawyer with conviction.  I am disappointed as to how my case was handled.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1816">Ted Folkman</a>.</p>
<p>Dear Atty.</p>
<p>I am now convinced that you:are 100 percent correct  that it is  hard to get a good/knowledgeable lawyer with conviction.  I am disappointed as to how my case was handled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dolores Barot		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/04/16/case-day-barot-v-embassy-zambia/#comment-1825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dolores Barot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 19:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17983#comment-1825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Atty,

I am wondering  because my motion to proceed in forma pauper was granted by Judge E. Boasberg and then the case was handled and decided by Judge Amy Berman Jackson

For your clarification please.  Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Atty,</p>
<p>I am wondering  because my motion to proceed in forma pauper was granted by Judge E. Boasberg and then the case was handled and decided by Judge Amy Berman Jackson</p>
<p>For your clarification please.  Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
