<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Choice of Court Agreement Convention On The Verge	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/02/17/choice-court-agreement-convention-verge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/02/17/choice-court-agreement-convention-verge/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Future of International Judicial Assistance &#124; Dispute Resolution Germany		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/02/17/choice-court-agreement-convention-verge/#comment-1740</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Future of International Judicial Assistance &#124; Dispute Resolution Germany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17645#comment-1740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Hague activity around existing conventions. The biggest game changer would of course be if the United States ratified the 2005 Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Ted is better placed to assess whether the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hague activity around existing conventions. The biggest game changer would of course be if the United States ratified the 2005 Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Ted is better placed to assess whether the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tenth Anniversary Post: Peter Bert on the Future of IJA &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/02/17/choice-court-agreement-convention-verge/#comment-1739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tenth Anniversary Post: Peter Bert on the Future of IJA &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17645#comment-1739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Hague activity around existing conventions. The biggest game changer would of course be if the United States ratified the 2005 Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Ted is better placed to assess whether the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hague activity around existing conventions. The biggest game changer would of course be if the United States ratified the 2005 Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Ted is better placed to assess whether the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements &#8211; A U.S. Perspective &#124; Dispute Resolution in Germany		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2014/02/17/choice-court-agreement-convention-verge/#comment-1738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements &#8211; A U.S. Perspective &#124; Dispute Resolution in Germany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17645#comment-1738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] EU should become a party of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Today, Ted Folkman provides the U.S. perspective on the Convention on his blog, Letters Blogatory, following up on an earlier post on the different proposals on how to [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] EU should become a party of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Today, Ted Folkman provides the U.S. perspective on the Convention on his blog, Letters Blogatory, following up on an earlier post on the different proposals on how to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
