Comments on: Case of the Day: Drew Technologies v. Robert Bosch LLC

By: Case of the Day: Ackelson v. Manley Toys | Letters Blogatory

Case of the Day: Ackelson v. Manley Toys | Letters Blogatory — Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:06:05 +0000

[…] Iowa rule of civil procedure applies whenever service cannot be made by another means, whereas there is an argument to be made that FRCP 4(f)(3), the rule that federal courts point to when authorizing this method of service, […]

By: Article of the Day: Bill Dodge on Substituted Service - Folkman LLC

Article of the Day: Bill Dodge on Substituted Service - Folkman LLC — Tue, 17 May 2022 10:01:07 +0000

[…] Bill notes that substituted service is an example of the ways in which state law is relevant to transnational litigation. State long-arm statutes are another example. But let me raise a procedural issue I’ve raised before,1 […]

By: Case of the Day: Patrick’s Restaurant v. Singh | Letters Blogatory

Case of the Day: Patrick’s Restaurant v. Singh | Letters Blogatory — Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:53:25 +0000

[…] Hague Service Convention. He could simply have authorized service on the US lawyer. There are some doubts about whether this procedure works (because FRCP 4(f) applies only when service is to be made […]

By: Service on a Foreign Defendant's U.S. Counsel | Hague Law Blog

Service on a Foreign Defendant's U.S. Counsel | Hague Law Blog — Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:34:25 +0000

[…] a line of cases he’s explored over the years. As Ted points out in the comments below, only one case, out of E.D. Mich., has gotten it right, but he squares the circle for the others quite nicely in his thoughts on the […]

By: Case of the Day: Products & Ventures International v. Axus Stationery | Letters Blogatory

Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:22:20 +0000

[…] unsurprisingly, the court did not consider the textual issue we’ve discussed before: whether FRCP 4(f)(3) can ever permit service on a foreign defendant’s US counsel, given that […]

By: Case of the Day: United States v. Public Warehousing Co. | Letters Blogatory

Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:02:47 +0000

[…] process on the Kuwaiti defendants’ US lawyer is conventionally proper, unless you worry about cases like Drew Technologies v. Robert Bosch, which have thrown some cold water on the idea of serving process on a foreign defendant via service […]

By: Case of the Day: Freedom Watch v. OPEC | Letters Blogatory

Case of the Day: Freedom Watch v. OPEC | Letters Blogatory — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:26:52 +0000

[…] US lawyer should never be permissible under FRCP 4(f)(3). I noted this issue in my post on Drew Technologies v. Bosch. I think this is a fair reading of the rule, though not a correct one, if only because it is […]

By: Case of the Day: In Re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation | Letters Blogatory

Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:13:48 +0000

[…] pursuant to FRCP 4(f)(3). Beijing-Matsushita made the same argument that the defendant made in Drew Technologies v. Robert Bosch LLC (E.D. Mich. 2013): because FRCP 4(f)(3) permits alternate methods of service “at a place not within any […]