<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Atlantic Marine: The Supreme Court on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/12/04/atlantic-marine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/12/04/atlantic-marine/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Dahman v. Embassy of Qatar &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/12/04/atlantic-marine/#comment-1624</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Dahman v. Embassy of Qatar &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17149#comment-1624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] found the agreement to arbitrate valid and found that Dahman had failed to show, as required by the Atlantic Marine case, that &#8220;public-interest factors overwhelmingly disfavor a transfer.&#8221; I won&#8217;t delve [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] found the agreement to arbitrate valid and found that Dahman had failed to show, as required by the Atlantic Marine case, that &#8220;public-interest factors overwhelmingly disfavor a transfer.&#8221; I won&#8217;t delve [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
