<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lago Agrio: Trial Ends with Unusual Own Goal	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/12/02/lago-agrio-trial-ends-unusual-goal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/12/02/lago-agrio-trial-ends-unusual-goal/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agria: Judge Guerra Revisited &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/12/02/lago-agrio-trial-ends-unusual-goal/#comment-1623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agria: Judge Guerra Revisited &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17112#comment-1623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] forensics witness who claimed he had examined Judge Zambrano&#8217;s computers, but his evidence turned out to undermine rather than support the case that Judge Zambrano was the author of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] forensics witness who claimed he had examined Judge Zambrano&#8217;s computers, but his evidence turned out to undermine rather than support the case that Judge Zambrano was the author of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agrio: What About The Ghostwriting? &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/12/02/lago-agrio-trial-ends-unusual-goal/#comment-1622</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agrio: What About The Ghostwriting? &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17112#comment-1622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] involvement doesn&#8217;t seem really strong, Chevron&#8217;s response to the Tarco report, which I covered previously, casts doubt on Judge Zambrano&#8217;s claims regarding the details of when he wrote the judgment, [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] involvement doesn&#8217;t seem really strong, Chevron&#8217;s response to the Tarco report, which I covered previously, casts doubt on Judge Zambrano&#8217;s claims regarding the details of when he wrote the judgment, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/12/02/lago-agrio-trial-ends-unusual-goal/#comment-1621</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 20:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=17112#comment-1621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An astute reader reminded me that Chevron has a common law fraud claim in addition to the RICO claim, and thus that even if the RICO claim fails, the case will not necessarily be over, as I wrote. I think this is right: I wished the fraud claim away, because as I have noted before, it&#039;s a loopy kind of claim. Chevron didn&#039;t rely on any fraudulent misstatement, and the claim rests on what Judge Kaplan thinks New York law allows&#8212;a claim for fraud without proof of reliance. I hope he&#039;s not right about that, but if he is, then the case could still proceed without the RICO count. 

Another point I should add about questions that will arise if Chevron wins: will the Second Circuit countenance a &lt;em&gt;permanent&lt;/em&gt; injunction against efforts to obtain recognition of the judgment in other jurisdictions, when it previously refused to countenance a &lt;em&gt;preliminary&lt;/em&gt; injunction?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An astute reader reminded me that Chevron has a common law fraud claim in addition to the RICO claim, and thus that even if the RICO claim fails, the case will not necessarily be over, as I wrote. I think this is right: I wished the fraud claim away, because as I have noted before, it&#8217;s a loopy kind of claim. Chevron didn&#8217;t rely on any fraudulent misstatement, and the claim rests on what Judge Kaplan thinks New York law allows&mdash;a claim for fraud without proof of reliance. I hope he&#8217;s not right about that, but if he is, then the case could still proceed without the RICO count. </p>
<p>Another point I should add about questions that will arise if Chevron wins: will the Second Circuit countenance a <em>permanent</em> injunction against efforts to obtain recognition of the judgment in other jurisdictions, when it previously refused to countenance a <em>preliminary</em> injunction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
