<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Interbrew v. Molson Coors	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/10/28/interbrew-molson-coors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/10/28/interbrew-molson-coors/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Application of Platebright Ltd. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/10/28/interbrew-molson-coors/#comment-1529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Application of Platebright Ltd. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=16600#comment-1529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The case of the day is In re Application of Platebright Ltd. (D.V.I. 2014). This is our first case from the District Court of the Virgin Islands, and the first &#167; 1782 case from the Virgin Islands to be reported in a Westlaw database.  The application itself, and the outcome of the case, was entirely routine: the court granted an application for bank records relevant to a UK fraud case brought by Plateright Ltd., a UK firm, against Island Eco Resorts Ltd. and its director, Simon Piggott. There is, though, one interesting point. The application was referred first to a magistrate judge, and the magistrate issued a report and recommendation rather than a decision on the application. As I noted in a prior post, there&#8217;s a question whether a &#167; 1782 application is a dispositive matter that must be decided by a district judge, or whether it&#8217;s the kind of matter that can be referred to a magistrate judge for a decision (subject to a party&#8217;s right to make objections to the district judge). This case implies&#8212;but doesn&#8217;t say expressly&#8212;that in the Virgin Islands, at least, a magistrate judge lacks the power to make a final decision on a &#167; 1782 application. As we saw, a magistrate judge in the District of New Jersey (which, like the Virgin Islands, is in the Third Circuit) take the contrary view, as did a magistrate judge in the District of Colorado. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The case of the day is In re Application of Platebright Ltd. (D.V.I. 2014). This is our first case from the District Court of the Virgin Islands, and the first &sect; 1782 case from the Virgin Islands to be reported in a Westlaw database.  The application itself, and the outcome of the case, was entirely routine: the court granted an application for bank records relevant to a UK fraud case brought by Plateright Ltd., a UK firm, against Island Eco Resorts Ltd. and its director, Simon Piggott. There is, though, one interesting point. The application was referred first to a magistrate judge, and the magistrate issued a report and recommendation rather than a decision on the application. As I noted in a prior post, there&#8217;s a question whether a &sect; 1782 application is a dispositive matter that must be decided by a district judge, or whether it&#8217;s the kind of matter that can be referred to a magistrate judge for a decision (subject to a party&#8217;s right to make objections to the district judge). This case implies&mdash;but doesn&#8217;t say expressly&mdash;that in the Virgin Islands, at least, a magistrate judge lacks the power to make a final decision on a &sect; 1782 application. As we saw, a magistrate judge in the District of New Jersey (which, like the Virgin Islands, is in the Third Circuit) take the contrary view, as did a magistrate judge in the District of Colorado. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
