<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Corporaci&#243;n Mexicana de Mantenimiento Integral v. PEMEX-Exploraci&#243;n Y Producci&#243;n	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/09/16/commisa-pemex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/09/16/commisa-pemex/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite Co. v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/09/16/commisa-pemex/#comment-1441</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite Co. v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=16161#comment-1441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] 487 F.3d 928, 935 (D.C. Cir. 2007). But there are rare exceptions. Indeed, I covered one of them, COMMISA v. PEMEX, in September 2013. There, it was Mexico&#8217;s courts that annulled the awards, acting in a way [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 487 F.3d 928, 935 (D.C. Cir. 2007). But there are rare exceptions. Indeed, I covered one of them, COMMISA v. PEMEX, in September 2013. There, it was Mexico&#8217;s courts that annulled the awards, acting in a way [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
