<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Compelling German Third-party Witnesses to Testify in US Litigation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Deposing Third Party Witnesses in Germany: The Same, but Different &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deposing Third Party Witnesses in Germany: The Same, but Different &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 01:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15856#comment-1425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] an earlier post, we looked at the possibility to compel German third party witnesses to testify. Parties to US [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] an earlier post, we looked at the possibility to compel German third party witnesses to testify. Parties to US [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deposing Third Party Witnesses in Germany: The Same, but Different &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1424</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deposing Third Party Witnesses in Germany: The Same, but Different &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15856#comment-1424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] an earlier post, we looked at the possibility to compel German third party witnesses to testify. Parties to US [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] an earlier post, we looked at the possibility to compel German third party witnesses to testify. Parties to US [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1423</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15856#comment-1423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1422&quot;&gt;Peter Bert&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, that is the issue I mean. I have been advised that in some cases it&#039;s possible to ask the judge to put follow-up questions to a witness, but in that case we ended up not going ahead with the discovery so we never tested it. I would welcome another post on the mechanics of this!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1422">Peter Bert</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, that is the issue I mean. I have been advised that in some cases it&#8217;s possible to ask the judge to put follow-up questions to a witness, but in that case we ended up not going ahead with the discovery so we never tested it. I would welcome another post on the mechanics of this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Bert		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Bert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15856#comment-1422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1421&quot;&gt;Ted Folkman&lt;/a&gt;.

Ted, this raises a whole host of issues. To your immediate point: The parties to the U.S. litigation or their legal representatives (who not necessarily need to be admitted to the German bar) are allowed to participate at the witness deposition. In my experience, the issue sometimes is that the German court does not inform the US party or its representatives that and when it will hear the witness.

However, even if the party attends or is represented, they are in for a surprise: in accordance with German civil procedure rules and practice the judge rather than the parties or their lawyers performs and controls the taking of the testimony. It would actually be worth a separate post to look at how the interrogation will be handled, the testimony will be recorded, and&#8212;of course&#8212;the issue of translation and interpretation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1421">Ted Folkman</a>.</p>
<p>Ted, this raises a whole host of issues. To your immediate point: The parties to the U.S. litigation or their legal representatives (who not necessarily need to be admitted to the German bar) are allowed to participate at the witness deposition. In my experience, the issue sometimes is that the German court does not inform the US party or its representatives that and when it will hear the witness.</p>
<p>However, even if the party attends or is represented, they are in for a surprise: in accordance with German civil procedure rules and practice the judge rather than the parties or their lawyers performs and controls the taking of the testimony. It would actually be worth a separate post to look at how the interrogation will be handled, the testimony will be recorded, and&mdash;of course&mdash;the issue of translation and interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/21/compelling-german-third-party-witnesses-to-testify-in-us-litigation/#comment-1421</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15856#comment-1421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Peter, German lawyers have given me varying advice about the extent to which the US lawyer gets to participate in the questioning. What&#039;s your view? Does it vary by court or by judge?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, German lawyers have given me varying advice about the extent to which the US lawyer gets to participate in the questioning. What&#8217;s your view? Does it vary by court or by judge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
