Comments on: Case of the Day: Montana Trucks, LLC v. UD Trucks North America, Inc. https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/09/case-of-the-day-montana-trucks-llc-v-ud-trucks-north-america-inc/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:12:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Case of the Day: Moskovitz v. La Suisse | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/09/case-of-the-day-montana-trucks-llc-v-ud-trucks-north-america-inc/#comment-1419 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:01:31 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15660#comment-1419 […] instruction manual on foreign service probably has something to do with this. I note, however, my view that because FRCP 4(f)(2)(C)(ii) permits service by mail only “if there is no internationally […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: LT Game International v. DEQ Systems | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/08/09/case-of-the-day-montana-trucks-llc-v-ud-trucks-north-america-inc/#comment-1418 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:01:15 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15660#comment-1418 […] I would go further and say that FRCP 4(f)(2)(C)(ii) never permits service by mail in Hague Service Convention cases, because the rule applies only if the Convention “allows but does not specify other means,” which is manifestly not the case. […]

]]>