<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Wires Jolley LLP v. Shlaimoun	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 01:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15284#comment-1386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1385&quot;&gt;Antonin I. Pribetic&lt;/a&gt;.

Right. A malpractice action in LA is doubleplusungood.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1385">Antonin I. Pribetic</a>.</p>
<p>Right. A malpractice action in LA is doubleplusungood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Antonin I. Pribetic		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonin I. Pribetic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15284#comment-1385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1384&quot;&gt;Ted Folkman&lt;/a&gt;.

I suppose so, if Ontario is the arbitral seat, then that&#039;s the place to set aside the arbitral award.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1384">Ted Folkman</a>.</p>
<p>I suppose so, if Ontario is the arbitral seat, then that&#8217;s the place to set aside the arbitral award.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1384</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15284#comment-1384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1383&quot;&gt;Antonin I. Pribetic&lt;/a&gt;.

Interesting. But surely the right thing for the clients to do would be to ask an Ontario court to set the award aside?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1383">Antonin I. Pribetic</a>.</p>
<p>Interesting. But surely the right thing for the clients to do would be to ask an Ontario court to set the award aside?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Antonin I. Pribetic		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/19/case-of-the-day-wires-jolley-llp-v-shlaimoun/#comment-1383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonin I. Pribetic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15284#comment-1383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ontario public policy prevents the parties from contracting out of the statutory protections contained in the Solicitors Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S. 15,and any arbitration must be conducted as if it were an assessment: Jean Estate v. Wires Jolley LLP, 2009 ONCA 339 (On. C.A.). I wonder if this arbitration was conducted in a similar fashion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ontario public policy prevents the parties from contracting out of the statutory protections contained in the Solicitors Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S. 15,and any arbitration must be conducted as if it were an assessment: Jean Estate v. Wires Jolley LLP, 2009 ONCA 339 (On. C.A.). I wonder if this arbitration was conducted in a similar fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
