<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: SerVaas Inc. v. Republic of Iraq	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15134#comment-1380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1379&quot;&gt;Anders&lt;/a&gt;.

Anders, there was a later &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/10/07/case-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-iraq/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Second Circuit&lt;/a&gt; decision, which I covered in October 2013. Also, the judge &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/servaas.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;overruled in part and sustained in part&lt;/a&gt; objections to the magistrate judge&#039;s decision that was the subject of this post and &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/servaas2.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;held the Iraqi government and some of its lawyers in contempt&lt;/a&gt; for failure to comply with their discovery obligations. I believe that that last order is still on appeal. Ethan&#039;s comments, above, noted some of these developments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1379">Anders</a>.</p>
<p>Anders, there was a later <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/10/07/case-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-iraq/" rel="nofollow ugc">Second Circuit</a> decision, which I covered in October 2013. Also, the judge <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/servaas.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">overruled in part and sustained in part</a> objections to the magistrate judge&#8217;s decision that was the subject of this post and <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/servaas2.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">held the Iraqi government and some of its lawyers in contempt</a> for failure to comply with their discovery obligations. I believe that that last order is still on appeal. Ethan&#8217;s comments, above, noted some of these developments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anders		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15134#comment-1379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ted,

Is there something new in this case? I can&#039;t find anything but considering how it goes..??

Regards 
Anders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ted,</p>
<p>Is there something new in this case? I can&#8217;t find anything but considering how it goes..??</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Anders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ethan		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ethan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15134#comment-1378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[appeals to follow ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>appeals to follow &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ethan		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 01:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15134#comment-1377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the end, Iraq and its attorneys were sanctioned]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, Iraq and its attorneys were sanctioned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ethan		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ethan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15134#comment-1376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ps the contempt was NOT of the Magistrate Judge&#039;s discovery orders (as written in the article).  Rather, the post-judgment discovery order was issued by the District Court Judge (Berman) himself (and, thus, subject to the certification process before the Magistrate).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps the contempt was NOT of the Magistrate Judge&#8217;s discovery orders (as written in the article).  Rather, the post-judgment discovery order was issued by the District Court Judge (Berman) himself (and, thus, subject to the certification process before the Magistrate).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ethan		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1375</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ethan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15134#comment-1375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Opinion and Order dated Nov. 4, 2013, the District Court Judge (Berman) reversed that part of the Magistrate Judge&#039;s opinion that denied SerVaas&#039; motion for the certification of facts of contempt (and ordered a conference for the scheduling of a &quot;contempt/sanctions hearing&quot;).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Opinion and Order dated Nov. 4, 2013, the District Court Judge (Berman) reversed that part of the Magistrate Judge&#8217;s opinion that denied SerVaas&#8217; motion for the certification of facts of contempt (and ordered a conference for the scheduling of a &#8220;contempt/sanctions hearing&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: SerVaas Inc. v. Republic of Iraq &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/07/12/case-of-the-day-servaas-inc-v-republic-of-iraq/#comment-1374</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: SerVaas Inc. v. Republic of Iraq &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15134#comment-1374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] District Court&#8217;s decision granting SerVaas&#8217;s motion for summary judgment; second, we looked at some post-judgment discovery issues. Here were the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] District Court&#8217;s decision granting SerVaas&#8217;s motion for summary judgment; second, we looked at some post-judgment discovery issues. Here were the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
