<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Letters Blogatory FOIA Update: I&#8217;ve Filed A Motion Seeking Production Of A Vaughn Index	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/06/27/letters-blogatory-foia-update-ive-filed-a-motion-seeking-production-of-a-vaughn-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/06/27/letters-blogatory-foia-update-ive-filed-a-motion-seeking-production-of-a-vaughn-index/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/06/27/letters-blogatory-foia-update-ive-filed-a-motion-seeking-production-of-a-vaughn-index/#comment-1367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15037#comment-1367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[USMS Agency&#039;s Polic Officers in New York unlawfully invaded my Bronx County New York home WITHOUT search warrant; probable cause; reasonable cause; exigent circumstances and etc with their guns displayed and caused property damages and legal fees to me based upon a Charlotte North Carolina State&#039;s Reliable Confidential Informant making statements against my New York Home.

Civil Rights case against USMS Agency&#039;s police in New York: USMS Agency claim it was a mistake to invade my home and conduct search and then offered me $30,000.  I REJECTED!

Federal Judge&#039;s order compelled Government to produce documentation regarding the North Carolina State&#039;s Confidential Informant.  Government REFUSED to do so. Then Federal Judges granted the Government&#039;s Summary Judgment motion under Qualified Immunity by claiming that USMS Agency Police Officers&#039; mistake was caused by the North Carolina State&#039;s Confidential Informant.

FOIA civil case in Washington DC:  Federal Judge&#039;s order granted the Government&#039;s Summary Judgment motion by claiming that under FOIA&#039;s exemption the Government can withhold responsive documents regarding the North Carolina State&#039;s Reliable Confidential Informant. The Government&#039;s Declaration is considered to be used in the place of the Vaugh Index.  (13 Civ 1115 (RMC))]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USMS Agency&#8217;s Polic Officers in New York unlawfully invaded my Bronx County New York home WITHOUT search warrant; probable cause; reasonable cause; exigent circumstances and etc with their guns displayed and caused property damages and legal fees to me based upon a Charlotte North Carolina State&#8217;s Reliable Confidential Informant making statements against my New York Home.</p>
<p>Civil Rights case against USMS Agency&#8217;s police in New York: USMS Agency claim it was a mistake to invade my home and conduct search and then offered me $30,000.  I REJECTED!</p>
<p>Federal Judge&#8217;s order compelled Government to produce documentation regarding the North Carolina State&#8217;s Confidential Informant.  Government REFUSED to do so. Then Federal Judges granted the Government&#8217;s Summary Judgment motion under Qualified Immunity by claiming that USMS Agency Police Officers&#8217; mistake was caused by the North Carolina State&#8217;s Confidential Informant.</p>
<p>FOIA civil case in Washington DC:  Federal Judge&#8217;s order granted the Government&#8217;s Summary Judgment motion by claiming that under FOIA&#8217;s exemption the Government can withhold responsive documents regarding the North Carolina State&#8217;s Reliable Confidential Informant. The Government&#8217;s Declaration is considered to be used in the place of the Vaugh Index.  (13 Civ 1115 (RMC))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: There Will Be No Vaughn Index (For Now) &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/06/27/letters-blogatory-foia-update-ive-filed-a-motion-seeking-production-of-a-vaughn-index/#comment-1366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[There Will Be No Vaughn Index (For Now) &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=15037#comment-1366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Blogatory&#8217;s FOIA case has hit another delay. Although I previously asked the court to order the State Department to produce a Vaughn index, and although the Department didn&#8217;t [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Blogatory&#8217;s FOIA case has hit another delay. Although I previously asked the court to order the State Department to produce a Vaughn index, and although the Department didn&#8217;t [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
