<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: In re Dubey	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/06/25/case-of-the-day-in-re-dubey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/06/25/case-of-the-day-in-re-dubey/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:21:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Application of Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/06/25/case-of-the-day-in-re-dubey/#comment-1358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Application of Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14855#comment-1358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] tribunal.&#8221; I&#8217;ve considered this question a few times before, for example here, here and [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] tribunal.&#8221; I&#8217;ve considered this question a few times before, for example here, here and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Kleimar N.V. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/06/25/case-of-the-day-in-re-dubey/#comment-1357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Kleimar N.V. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14855#comment-1357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] about this issue several times, most recently (and perhaps curtly) in April 2016, and earlier here, here and here. Second Circuit precedent has held that private arbitral tribunals are not tribunals for [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] about this issue several times, most recently (and perhaps curtly) in April 2016, and earlier here, here and here. Second Circuit precedent has held that private arbitral tribunals are not tribunals for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
