<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Wultz v. Bank of China	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/15/case-of-the-day-wultz-v-bank-of-china-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/15/case-of-the-day-wultz-v-bank-of-china-2/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 03:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Moriah v. Bank of China &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/15/case-of-the-day-wultz-v-bank-of-china-2/#comment-1317</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Moriah v. Bank of China &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14206#comment-1317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] v. Bank of China (S.D.N.Y. 2015). The case is related to Wultz v. Bank of China, which we saw in May 2013 and November 2012. The case involves a 2006 suicide bombing in Tel Aviv. The Bank of China is [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] v. Bank of China (S.D.N.Y. 2015). The case is related to Wultz v. Bank of China, which we saw in May 2013 and November 2012. The case involves a 2006 suicide bombing in Tel Aviv. The Bank of China is [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Letters Blogatory&#039;s Top Ten Posts for 2013 &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/15/case-of-the-day-wultz-v-bank-of-china-2/#comment-1316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Letters Blogatory&#039;s Top Ten Posts for 2013 &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14206#comment-1316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Case of the Day: Wultz v. Bank of China, May 15, 2013. Another China case, this time involving an Aerospatiale analysis in the shadow of China&#8217;s banking secrecy laws. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Case of the Day: Wultz v. Bank of China, May 15, 2013. Another China case, this time involving an Aerospatiale analysis in the shadow of China&#8217;s banking secrecy laws. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
