Comments on: In re Application of Mesa Power Group, LLC: Is It Constitutional for a Magistrate Judge To Decide A Section 1782 Application? https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Sun, 01 Dec 2024 03:31:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Case of the Day: In re Petition of Macquarie Bank | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/#comment-22641 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:56:04 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14251#comment-22641 […] dispute rather than a dispositive motion. Readers interested in that issue can take a look at my post on that […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: In re Gonzalez | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/#comment-22094 Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:24:20 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14251#comment-22094 […] of the magistrate judge’s role in a Section 1782 case has been on the Letters Blogatory radar for years. In cases where the parties have not consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction, the […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: CPC Patent Technologies v. Apple - Folkman LLC https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/#comment-1323 Wed, 08 Jun 2022 10:01:06 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14251#comment-1323 […] practice in the Ninth Circuit, one that I’ve discussed several times before, most notably here. What authority does a magistrate judge have to decide applications under Section 1782 in the […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: AIS v. Thoratec | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/#comment-1322 Mon, 18 Mar 2019 11:32:04 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14251#comment-1322 […] FRCP 72, even though it ended up holding that that issue wasn’t properly before it. This is a recurring issue in Section 1782 practice: what is the standard of review for a district judge’s review of a […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: Mesa Power Group v. Canada | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/#comment-1321 Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:04:17 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14251#comment-1321 […] Miami. I’ve previously covered some 1782 applications that arose out of it (here, here, and here). Here were the facts: Ontario launched a renewable energy program called the Feed-in Tariff […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: Andover Healthcare v. 3M | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/#comment-1320 Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:00:59 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14251#comment-1320 […] was the standard of review to be applied—this is one of my favorite issues, which I’ve covered before. Here is the issue: is a decision on a § 1782 application a dispositive matter, in which case […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: In re Application of Platebright Ltd. | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/#comment-1319 Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:35:38 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14251#comment-1319 […] issued a report and recommendation rather than a decision on the application. As I noted in a prior post, there’s a question whether a § 1782 application is a dispositive matter that must be […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: Interbrew v. Molson Coors | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/05/13/magistrate-judge-1782/#comment-1318 Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:02:13 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14251#comment-1318 […] or whether she could only make a report and recommendation to the court. This was an issue I have previously considered. Judge Mix concluded that she had authority to decide the matter, though she noted the issue was […]

]]>