<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lago Agrio: Zambrano Strikes Back	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/04/08/lago-agrio-zambrano-strikes-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/04/08/lago-agrio-zambrano-strikes-back/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Zambrano Deposition: Failure To Launch &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/04/08/lago-agrio-zambrano-strikes-back/#comment-1257</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Zambrano Deposition: Failure To Launch &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=13605#comment-1257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] in Peru where he was scheduled to testify. Recall that theLago Agrio plaintiffs had submitted a declaration from Judge Zambrano rebutting the claims of corruption made by Judge Alberto Guerra Bastidas in a declaration that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in Peru where he was scheduled to testify. Recall that theLago Agrio plaintiffs had submitted a declaration from Judge Zambrano rebutting the claims of corruption made by Judge Alberto Guerra Bastidas in a declaration that [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/04/08/lago-agrio-zambrano-strikes-back/#comment-1256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=13605#comment-1256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/04/08/lago-agrio-zambrano-strikes-back/#comment-1255&quot;&gt;Max Kennerly&lt;/a&gt;.

I think that in light of the dynamics between Judge Kaplan and the Second Circuit, he is unlikely to grant summary judgment. Why give the Circuit a de novo review?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/04/08/lago-agrio-zambrano-strikes-back/#comment-1255">Max Kennerly</a>.</p>
<p>I think that in light of the dynamics between Judge Kaplan and the Second Circuit, he is unlikely to grant summary judgment. Why give the Circuit a de novo review?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Max Kennerly		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/04/08/lago-agrio-zambrano-strikes-back/#comment-1255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennerly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=13605#comment-1255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a general matter, I&#039;d agree a trial on the merits would be warranted, but that&#039;s not how federal courts work these days. Federal courts routinely grant summary judgment against plaintiffs alleging fraud when they are unable to muster evidence beyond an uncorroborated witness, holding that the proof cannot possibly be &#039;clear and convincing,&#039; as required by many state&#039;s fraud precedent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a general matter, I&#8217;d agree a trial on the merits would be warranted, but that&#8217;s not how federal courts work these days. Federal courts routinely grant summary judgment against plaintiffs alleging fraud when they are unable to muster evidence beyond an uncorroborated witness, holding that the proof cannot possibly be &#8216;clear and convincing,&#8217; as required by many state&#8217;s fraud precedent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
