Comments on: Service by Email and Facebook: FTC v. PCCare247 Inc.

By: Case of the Day: St. Francis Assisi v. Kuwait Finance House | Letters Blogatory

Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:50:09 +0000

[…] The case of the day is St. Francis Assisi v. Kuwait Finance House (N.D. Cal. 2016). St. Francis, a non-profit, sued Hajjaj al-Ajmi, alleging that he had financed ISIS, which was responsible for the murder of Assyrian Christians in Iraq and Syria. St. Francis moved for leave to serve process on al-Ajmi via Twitter. The judge made a glaring mistake. She wrote that Kuwait is “not a signatory to the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents,” when in fact it is. So the judge’s conclusion that service by Twitter was not barred by an international agreement—a necessary finding under FRCP 4(f)(3)—failed even to address the Convention. It’s my view that alternate means of service such as service by email, service by Facebook, service by Twitter, etc., are impermissible under the Convention particularly when, as in the case of Kuwait, the state of destination has objected to service by postal channels (since such methods are permissible, if at all, only by analogy to service by post). For a quick summary of my view, see Gurung v. Malotra is Wrongly Decided and FTC v. PCCare 247. […]

By: US Court Approves International Service of Process by Facebook | Letters Blogatory | Letters Blogatory

Sun, 06 May 2018 17:00:45 +0000

[…] FTC v. PCCare247 Inc., which will be cross-posted on his blog. Readers may also be interested in my take on the case. Suffice it to say that in my view service by Facebook is impermissible if the Convention […]

By: Rahul Rathi

Rahul Rathi — Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:04:38 +0000

I’m Rahul I see many tech support company scam with USA, Germany, Australia, South Africa, and UK all country are targeted. This all work done by PCC through Microsoft and Google Adword how we stop these scams company coz all are targeted old people and make money.