Comments on: German Federal Constitutional Court: Risk of Punitive Damages No Reason to Prevent Service of U.S. Action https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/02/22/german-federal-constitutional-court-risk-of-punitive-damages-no-reason-to-prevent-service-of-u-s-action/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Sun, 01 Dec 2024 04:22:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Case of the Day: Elfaridi v. Mercedes-Benz | Letters Blogatory | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/02/22/german-federal-constitutional-court-risk-of-punitive-damages-no-reason-to-prevent-service-of-u-s-action/#comment-1217 Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:00:36 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=12807#comment-1217 […] claims in which the plaintiffs do not, and will not” seek punitive damages. On this issue, Peter Bert’s 2013 post explains that service of a US complaint seeking punitive damages on a German defendant via the […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: In re Takata | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/02/22/german-federal-constitutional-court-risk-of-punitive-damages-no-reason-to-prevent-service-of-u-s-action/#comment-1216 Thu, 04 May 2017 10:00:13 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=12807#comment-1216 […] Special Master did note contrary German decisions (you may want to refer back to Peter Bert’s 2013 post, but the Special Master was not persuaded. Again, I think the best course is not to try to decide […]

]]>