https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/02/12/case-of-the-day-standard-chartered-bank-v-ahmad-hamad-al-gosaibi-brothers-co/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:24:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/02/12/case-of-the-day-standard-chartered-bank-v-ahmad-hamad-al-gosaibi-brothers-co/#comment-7238 Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:13:08 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=12519#comment-7238 […] not. (I wrote about the Pennsylvania case and the DC case back in 2014, and about the underlying New York case in […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/02/12/case-of-the-day-standard-chartered-bank-v-ahmad-hamad-al-gosaibi-brothers-co/#comment-1102 Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:04:17 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=12519#comment-1102 […] Greg! I have written about the case three times before, once in connection with an action in New York for recognition and enforcement of a Bahraini judgment, and twice in connection with § 1782 […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/02/12/case-of-the-day-standard-chartered-bank-v-ahmad-hamad-al-gosaibi-brothers-co/#comment-1101 Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:03:46 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=12519#comment-1101 […] or “AHAB.” AHAB, you may recall, has been the subject of two prior posts, one in February 2013, the other in October 2011. Fortress (more precisely, funds managed by Fortress) was the largest […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/02/12/case-of-the-day-standard-chartered-bank-v-ahmad-hamad-al-gosaibi-brothers-co/#comment-1100 Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:37:12 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=12519#comment-1100 The Appellate Division (First Department) affirmed the judgment on October 24, 2013. The only point of interest in the short decision is the holding that it is enough for the plaintiff to allege that the underlying judgment is conclusive; the plaintiff need not allege that each of the potential grounds for non-recognition does not exist.

]]>