<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Commissions Import Export S.A. v. Republic of the Congo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/01/10/case-of-the-day-commissions-import-export-s-a-v-republic-of-the-congo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/01/10/case-of-the-day-commissions-import-export-s-a-v-republic-of-the-congo/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Commissions Import Export v. Republic of the Congo &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/01/10/case-of-the-day-commissions-import-export-s-a-v-republic-of-the-congo/#comment-1032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Commissions Import Export v. Republic of the Congo &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=12048#comment-1032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] S.A. v. Republic of the Congo (D.D.C. 2015). I&#8217;ve written about this case twice before, once in the D.D.C. and once in the D.C. Circuit. In the previous case, the question was: when a party to a foreign [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] S.A. v. Republic of the Congo (D.D.C. 2015). I&#8217;ve written about this case twice before, once in the D.D.C. and once in the D.C. Circuit. In the previous case, the question was: when a party to a foreign [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Commissions Import Export SA v. Republic of the Congo &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2013/01/10/case-of-the-day-commissions-import-export-s-a-v-republic-of-the-congo/#comment-1031</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Commissions Import Export SA v. Republic of the Congo &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=12048#comment-1031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Import Export S.A. v. Republic of the Congo (D.C. Cir. 2014). This is the appeal of the decision I reported in January 2013. The holding in the District Court was that where a party to a foreign arbitration [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Import Export S.A. v. Republic of the Congo (D.C. Cir. 2014). This is the appeal of the decision I reported in January 2013. The holding in the District Court was that where a party to a foreign arbitration [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
