<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lago Agrio: Judge Kaplan Mostly Denies The Lago Agrio Plaintiffs&#8217; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/12/05/lago-agrio-judge-kaplan-mostly-denies-the-lago-agrio-plaintiffs-motion-for-judgment-on-the-pleadings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/12/05/lago-agrio-judge-kaplan-mostly-denies-the-lago-agrio-plaintiffs-motion-for-judgment-on-the-pleadings/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agrio: Supreme Court of Canada Denies Ecuadorans&#8217; Application for Leave to Appeal &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/12/05/lago-agrio-judge-kaplan-mostly-denies-the-lago-agrio-plaintiffs-motion-for-judgment-on-the-pleadings/#comment-998</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agrio: Supreme Court of Canada Denies Ecuadorans&#8217; Application for Leave to Appeal &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11510#comment-998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to me. I thought the claim against the LAPs was an affirmative claim for fraud, and when I&#8217;ve written about this before, it was through the lens of asking whether New York recognized a cause of action for fraud in the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to me. I thought the claim against the LAPs was an affirmative claim for fraud, and when I&#8217;ve written about this before, it was through the lens of asking whether New York recognized a cause of action for fraud in the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agrio: Chevron Seeks Leave To Sue Patton Boggs &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/12/05/lago-agrio-judge-kaplan-mostly-denies-the-lago-agrio-plaintiffs-motion-for-judgment-on-the-pleadings/#comment-997</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agrio: Chevron Seeks Leave To Sue Patton Boggs &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11510#comment-997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] one is a count for fraud. This is yet another example of a fraud claim that lacks any allegation that the party making the claim relied on the supposed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] one is a count for fraud. This is yet another example of a fraud claim that lacks any allegation that the party making the claim relied on the supposed [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agrio Plaintiffs Seek Mandamus &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/12/05/lago-agrio-judge-kaplan-mostly-denies-the-lago-agrio-plaintiffs-motion-for-judgment-on-the-pleadings/#comment-996</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agrio Plaintiffs Seek Mandamus &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11510#comment-996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] motion for summary judgment&#8212;as well as the order of November 27, 2012, which I discussed in a post on December 5, 2012, and an order of February 20, 2013, which I don&#8217;t think I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] motion for summary judgment&mdash;as well as the order of November 27, 2012, which I discussed in a post on December 5, 2012, and an order of February 20, 2013, which I don&#8217;t think I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agrio: Huaorani Intervention Denied &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/12/05/lago-agrio-judge-kaplan-mostly-denies-the-lago-agrio-plaintiffs-motion-for-judgment-on-the-pleadings/#comment-995</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agrio: Huaorani Intervention Denied &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11510#comment-995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] The Huaorani have taken steps to protect their interest in the Lago Agrio judgment, and they sought to intervene as defendants in Judge Kaplan&#8217;s court for that purpose. They had also previously filed their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Huaorani have taken steps to protect their interest in the Lago Agrio judgment, and they sought to intervene as defendants in Judge Kaplan&#8217;s court for that purpose. They had also previously filed their [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agrio: Huaorani Case Voluntarily DismissedLetters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/12/05/lago-agrio-judge-kaplan-mostly-denies-the-lago-agrio-plaintiffs-motion-for-judgment-on-the-pleadings/#comment-994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agrio: Huaorani Case Voluntarily DismissedLetters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11510#comment-994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] wrote a couple of days ago about the Huaorani motion for leave to intervene in Chevron&#8217;s RICO case against Donziger and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wrote a couple of days ago about the Huaorani motion for leave to intervene in Chevron&#8217;s RICO case against Donziger and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
