<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Wultz v. Bank of China	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/11/27/case-of-the-day-wultz-v-bank-of-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/11/27/case-of-the-day-wultz-v-bank-of-china/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Moriah v. Bank of China &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/11/27/case-of-the-day-wultz-v-bank-of-china/#comment-22768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Moriah v. Bank of China &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11341#comment-22768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] China (S.D.N.Y. 2015). The case is related to Wultz v. Bank of China, which we saw in May 2013 and November 2012. The case involves a 2006 suicide bombing in Tel Aviv. The Bank of China is alleged to be liable [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] China (S.D.N.Y. 2015). The case is related to Wultz v. Bank of China, which we saw in May 2013 and November 2012. The case involves a 2006 suicide bombing in Tel Aviv. The Bank of China is alleged to be liable [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Wultz v. Bank of China &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/11/27/case-of-the-day-wultz-v-bank-of-china/#comment-976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Wultz v. Bank of China &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11341#comment-976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] case of the day is Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd. (S.D.N.Y. 2013). We first considered this case in November 2012. Here was my description of the facts from the prior [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] case of the day is Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd. (S.D.N.Y. 2013). We first considered this case in November 2012. Here was my description of the facts from the prior [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
