<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Amaprop Ltd. v. Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/25/amaprop-indiabulls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/25/amaprop-indiabulls/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Sonera Holding BV v. &#199;ukurova Holding A&#350; &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/25/amaprop-indiabulls/#comment-23277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Sonera Holding BV v. &#199;ukurova Holding A&#350; &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11032#comment-23277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of discovery in aid of execution, but that argument seems plainly wrong. &#199;ukurova also cited Amaprop Ltd. v. Indiabulls Financial Services, the case of the day from October 25, 2012, but as I noted in my post on that case, it seems wrongly [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of discovery in aid of execution, but that argument seems plainly wrong. &Ccedil;ukurova also cited Amaprop Ltd. v. Indiabulls Financial Services, the case of the day from October 25, 2012, but as I noted in my post on that case, it seems wrongly [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Sonera Holding BV v. Çukurova Holding AŞ &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/25/amaprop-indiabulls/#comment-840</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Sonera Holding BV v. Çukurova Holding AŞ &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11032#comment-840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] of discovery in aid of execution, but that argument seems plainly wrong. &#199;ukurova also cited Amaprop Ltd. v. Indiabulls Financial Services, the case of the day from October 25, 2012, but as I noted in my post on that case, it seems wrongly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of discovery in aid of execution, but that argument seems plainly wrong. &Ccedil;ukurova also cited Amaprop Ltd. v. Indiabulls Financial Services, the case of the day from October 25, 2012, but as I noted in my post on that case, it seems wrongly [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
