<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: SB v. WA	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/23/sb-v-wa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/23/sb-v-wa/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Badawi v. Alesawy &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/23/sb-v-wa/#comment-22634</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Badawi v. Alesawy &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11014#comment-22634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the day is Badawi v. Alesawy (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). This is the appeal of the case of the day from October 23, 2012. The parties were married civilly in New York in 1998, and they had an Islamic wedding ceremony [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the day is Badawi v. Alesawy (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). This is the appeal of the case of the day from October 23, 2012. The parties were married civilly in New York in 1998, and they had an Islamic wedding ceremony [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Badawi v. Alesawy &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/23/sb-v-wa/#comment-836</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Badawi v. Alesawy &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11014#comment-836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] case of the day is Badawi v. Alesawy (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2017). I wrote about the case in 2012 and last year. Here was my description of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] case of the day is Badawi v. Alesawy (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2017). I wrote about the case in 2012 and last year. Here was my description of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Masri v. Masri &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/10/23/sb-v-wa/#comment-835</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Masri v. Masri &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=11014#comment-835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a way we can think about Sharia law here. I&#8217;ve written about this several times before (here, here, here, and here). Most discussion of &#8220;Sharia in America&#8221; is ridiculous and uninformed. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a way we can think about Sharia law here. I&#8217;ve written about this several times before (here, here, here, and here). Most discussion of &#8220;Sharia in America&#8221; is ridiculous and uninformed. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
