<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Lago Agrio Case in Brazil: Why?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/07/02/the-lago-agrio-case-in-brazil-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/07/02/the-lago-agrio-case-in-brazil-why/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 12:53:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agrio: Brazil Update &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/07/02/the-lago-agrio-case-in-brazil-why/#comment-683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agrio: Brazil Update &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 02:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=8840#comment-683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] has sent in a brief update on the status of the Lago Agrio homologation case in Brazil. Rafael previously posted about the case back in July [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has sent in a brief update on the status of the Lago Agrio homologation case in Brazil. Rafael previously posted about the case back in July [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/07/02/the-lago-agrio-case-in-brazil-why/#comment-682</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=8840#comment-682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Among the useful items Rafael notes, one of the most significant is probably worth calling out: according to Rafael, the Brazilian court could refuse recognition to the Ecuadoran judgment on the grounds that it violates Brazil&#039;s &lt;em&gt;ordre public&lt;/em&gt; in a case of extrinsic fraud. This suggests that Chevron will be able to make the same kinds of arguments in Brazil as it has been making in the United States. 

Question: Assume that Chevron prevails on its &lt;a href=&quot;http://lettersblogatory.com/2012/06/20/chevron-ecuador-rico-summary-judgment/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;motion for partial summary judgment in the RICO case&lt;/a&gt;. Recall that Chevron&#039;s motion argues that the Ecuadoran judgment is not entitled to recognition as a way of defeating the Lago Agrio plaintiffs&#039; affirmative defense (improvidently pleaded, I think) of res judicata. Will the US decision be entitled to preclusive effect in Brazil?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the useful items Rafael notes, one of the most significant is probably worth calling out: according to Rafael, the Brazilian court could refuse recognition to the Ecuadoran judgment on the grounds that it violates Brazil&#8217;s <em>ordre public</em> in a case of extrinsic fraud. This suggests that Chevron will be able to make the same kinds of arguments in Brazil as it has been making in the United States. </p>
<p>Question: Assume that Chevron prevails on its <a href="http://lettersblogatory.com/2012/06/20/chevron-ecuador-rico-summary-judgment/" rel="nofollow ugc">motion for partial summary judgment in the RICO case</a>. Recall that Chevron&#8217;s motion argues that the Ecuadoran judgment is not entitled to recognition as a way of defeating the Lago Agrio plaintiffs&#8217; affirmative defense (improvidently pleaded, I think) of res judicata. Will the US decision be entitled to preclusive effect in Brazil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rafael Salom&#227;o Romano on the Lago Agrio Case in Brazil &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/07/02/the-lago-agrio-case-in-brazil-why/#comment-681</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafael Salom&#227;o Romano on the Lago Agrio Case in Brazil &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=8840#comment-681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] a pleasure to introduce a guest post by Letters Blogatory&#8217;s correspondent in Brazil, Rafael Salom&#227;o Romano. Rafael is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a pleasure to introduce a guest post by Letters Blogatory&#8217;s correspondent in Brazil, Rafael Salom&atilde;o Romano. Rafael is a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
