<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Reply to Doug Cassel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/06/04/reply-to-doug-cassel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/06/04/reply-to-doug-cassel/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 03:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Wikeley v. Kea Investments &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/06/04/reply-to-doug-cassel/#comment-23595</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Wikeley v. Kea Investments &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 03:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=7579#comment-23595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] court trust the Kentucky courts to address the question on appeal? That question reminds me of the question of case-specific exceptions to the rule of recognition of foreign judgment in cases of fraud. In [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] court trust the Kentucky courts to address the question on appeal? That question reminds me of the question of case-specific exceptions to the rule of recognition of foreign judgment in cases of fraud. In [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
