Comments on: A New Kind of Estoppel?

By: Case of the Day: CDM Smith v. Atasi - Folkman LLC

Case of the Day: CDM Smith v. Atasi - Folkman LLC — Mon, 04 Apr 2022 11:00:21 +0000

[…] Chevron insisted on litigation in Ecuador and then attacked the Ecuadorian forum as inadequate. I wrote about that aspect of the Chevron case years ago, and I think the argument is even stronger […]

By: Whytock on The “Chevronization” of Transnational Litigation | Letters Blogatory | Letters Blogatory

Tue, 08 May 2018 17:47:16 +0000

[…] think what he is saying is that, contrary to my suggestion that Chevron had, essentially, assumed the risk that the political and judicial climate in Ecuador […]

By: Response to Ted Folkman | Letters Blogatory | Letters Blogatory

Response to Ted Folkman | Letters Blogatory | Letters Blogatory — Sun, 06 May 2018 23:03:07 +0000

[…] the adequacy of a foreign system for FNC purposes, he argues, the defendant should be barred by a “new kind of estoppel” from a case-specific challenge to any resulting foreign […]

By: Response to Ted Folkman | Letters Blogatory

Response to Ted Folkman | Letters Blogatory — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:30:36 +0000

[…] the adequacy of a foreign system for FNC purposes, he argues, the defendant should be barred by a “new kind of estoppel” from a case-specific challenge to any resulting foreign […]

By: A Follow-Up To Professor Brand | Letters Blogatory

A Follow-Up To Professor Brand | Letters Blogatory — Thu, 31 May 2012 18:05:47 +0000

[…] I want to offer some follow-up to the back-and-forth I had with Professor Brand yesterday. In his response to the Whytock/Robertson article, Professor Brand noted an inconsistency between the proposal, which would have the effect of […]