<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/04/05/thai-lao-laos-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/04/05/thai-lao-laos-3/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/04/05/thai-lao-laos-3/#comment-550</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=5985#comment-550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the case of day for August 25, 2011. I have also reported on two related cases under &#167; 1782, one a request for judicial assistance to obtain discovery from Laos itself, the other a request for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the case of day for August 25, 2011. I have also reported on two related cases under &sect; 1782, one a request for judicial assistance to obtain discovery from Laos itself, the other a request for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Lantheus Medical Imaging v. Atomic Energy of Canada &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/04/05/thai-lao-laos-3/#comment-549</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Lantheus Medical Imaging v. Atomic Energy of Canada &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=5985#comment-549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] in substance to the decision in Al Fayed v. CIA, 229 F.3d 272 (D.C. Cir. 2000), which I noted in my April 5, 2012 post on the Thai-Lao Lignite case. In both cases, the judges found that under ordinary rules of statutory interpretation, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in substance to the decision in Al Fayed v. CIA, 229 F.3d 272 (D.C. Cir. 2000), which I noted in my April 5, 2012 post on the Thai-Lao Lignite case. In both cases, the judges found that under ordinary rules of statutory interpretation, as [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Government of Ghana v. ProEnergy Services, LLC &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/04/05/thai-lao-laos-3/#comment-548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Government of Ghana v. ProEnergy Services, LLC &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=5985#comment-548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] 1782 proceedings Chevron brought in the Lago Agrio affair, though I also discussed it briefly in my post on Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos. &#8617;Rule 408 makes settlement offers and agreements, and statements made during settlement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 1782 proceedings Chevron brought in the Lago Agrio affair, though I also discussed it briefly in my post on Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos. &#8617;Rule 408 makes settlement offers and agreements, and statements made during settlement [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
