<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Thoughts On The Third Interim Award In the Chevron/Ecuador Case	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/29/chevron-ecuador-jurisdiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/29/chevron-ecuador-jurisdiction/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: More on the Doug Cassel Post &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/29/chevron-ecuador-jurisdiction/#comment-508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on the Doug Cassel Post &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=5037#comment-508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] have regularly noted the distinction between Texaco and Chevron (e.g., in my post on the BIT tribunal&#8217;s third interim award, my post on the Naranjo decision, and elsewhere), though I did not do so in the post on the Cassel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] have regularly noted the distinction between Texaco and Chevron (e.g., in my post on the BIT tribunal&#8217;s third interim award, my post on the Naranjo decision, and elsewhere), though I did not do so in the post on the Cassel [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
