<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ABA Resolves To Encourage US Courts To Respect Foreign Privacy and Data Protection Laws	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/24/aba-resolves-to-encourage-us-courts-to-respect-foreign-privacy-and-data-protection-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/24/aba-resolves-to-encourage-us-courts-to-respect-foreign-privacy-and-data-protection-laws/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: TruePosition v. LM Ericsson Telephone Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/24/aba-resolves-to-encourage-us-courts-to-respect-foreign-privacy-and-data-protection-laws/#comment-23765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: TruePosition v. LM Ericsson Telephone Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4911#comment-23765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] denied the motion for a protective order. This decision illustrates the point the ABA made in its recent resolution: US courts are reluctant to give much weight to foreign blocking statutes. Whether they are unduly [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] denied the motion for a protective order. This decision illustrates the point the ABA made in its recent resolution: US courts are reluctant to give much weight to foreign blocking statutes. Whether they are unduly [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Update: The Sedona Conference&#8217;s International Principles &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/24/aba-resolves-to-encourage-us-courts-to-respect-foreign-privacy-and-data-protection-laws/#comment-495</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Update: The Sedona Conference&#8217;s International Principles &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4911#comment-495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] February I posted on the American Bar Association&#8217;s  resolution encouraging courts to &#8220;consider and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] February I posted on the American Bar Association&#8217;s  resolution encouraging courts to &#8220;consider and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/24/aba-resolves-to-encourage-us-courts-to-respect-foreign-privacy-and-data-protection-laws/#comment-494</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4911#comment-494</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] legislative history of the statute gives strong indications that it was never expected or intended to be enforce against French subjects but was intended rather to provide them with tactical weapons and bargaining chips in foreign courts.&#8221; Take that, ABA! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] legislative history of the statute gives strong indications that it was never expected or intended to be enforce against French subjects but was intended rather to provide them with tactical weapons and bargaining chips in foreign courts.&#8221; Take that, ABA! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: TruePosition v. LM Ericsson Telephone Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/24/aba-resolves-to-encourage-us-courts-to-respect-foreign-privacy-and-data-protection-laws/#comment-493</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: TruePosition v. LM Ericsson Telephone Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4911#comment-493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] denied the motion for a protective order. This decision illustrates the point the ABA made in its recent resolution: US courts are reluctant to give much weight to foreign blocking statutes. Whether they are unduly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] denied the motion for a protective order. This decision illustrates the point the ABA made in its recent resolution: US courts are reluctant to give much weight to foreign blocking statutes. Whether they are unduly [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case to Watch: Linde v. Arab Bank &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/24/aba-resolves-to-encourage-us-courts-to-respect-foreign-privacy-and-data-protection-laws/#comment-492</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case to Watch: Linde v. Arab Bank &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4911#comment-492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] which was heard in the Second Circuit earlier this week. The case is timely in light of the recent ABA resolution on A&#233;rospatiale and foreign data protection [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] which was heard in the Second Circuit earlier this week. The case is timely in light of the recent ABA resolution on A&eacute;rospatiale and foreign data protection [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
