<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Two Wins For Chevron	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/18/two-wins-for-chevron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/18/two-wins-for-chevron/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:01:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lago Agrio: Dutch Supreme Court Affirms Decision In BIT Arbitration &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/18/two-wins-for-chevron/#comment-486</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Agrio: Dutch Supreme Court Affirms Decision In BIT Arbitration &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4826#comment-486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] against Ecuador arising out of the Lago Agrio case. I covered one of the interim awards in February 2012, if you can believe that, as well as the first instance judgment on the request for annulment in [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] against Ecuador arising out of the Lago Agrio case. I covered one of the interim awards in February 2012, if you can believe that, as well as the first instance judgment on the request for annulment in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Update on the Renewal of Ecuador&#8217;s Trade Preferences &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/18/two-wins-for-chevron/#comment-485</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Update on the Renewal of Ecuador&#8217;s Trade Preferences &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4826#comment-485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] judiciary, so I don&#8217;t see the force of her point as a matter of international law. I&#8217;ve previously noted that the Medell&#237;n case is an example of the United States in the same predicament. The US [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] judiciary, so I don&#8217;t see the force of her point as a matter of international law. I&#8217;ve previously noted that the Medell&iacute;n case is an example of the United States in the same predicament. The US [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: More on the Doug Cassel Post &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/18/two-wins-for-chevron/#comment-484</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on the Doug Cassel Post &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4826#comment-484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] of lending legitimacy to the proceedings that they are now able to deny. On the substance, I have previously given my reasons why the plaintiffs&#8217; arguments that &#8220;nobody in their right mind could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of lending legitimacy to the proceedings that they are now able to deny. On the substance, I have previously given my reasons why the plaintiffs&#8217; arguments that &#8220;nobody in their right mind could [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Two Wins for Chevron — Conflict of Laws .net		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/18/two-wins-for-chevron/#comment-483</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Two Wins for Chevron — Conflict of Laws .net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4826#comment-483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Here. (Possibly) Related: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here. (Possibly) Related: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Breaking: Arbitral Panel Issues New Order In Favor Of Chevron &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/02/18/two-wins-for-chevron/#comment-482</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breaking: Arbitral Panel Issues New Order In Favor Of Chevron &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4826#comment-482</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] [UPDATE: I have a full post up on this here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [UPDATE: I have a full post up on this here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
