<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Bitton	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/25/tracfone-bitton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/25/tracfone-bitton/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 01:58:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Curse of TracFone &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/25/tracfone-bitton/#comment-23506</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Curse of TracFone &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 03:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4048#comment-23506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] that I hope it does not get into the F. Supp. 2d, so as to avoid misleading lawyers.&#8221; The second time, I wrote that &#8220;the decision, while maybe not as wrongheaded as the first decision, is muddled [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] that I hope it does not get into the F. Supp. 2d, so as to avoid misleading lawyers.&#8221; The second time, I wrote that &#8220;the decision, while maybe not as wrongheaded as the first decision, is muddled [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracfone Case Rightly Decided &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/25/tracfone-bitton/#comment-431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracfone Case Rightly Decided &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4048#comment-431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] one, the judge allowed a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on a non-party in witness in Canada. In another, the decision was not so clearly wrong but was strange and confused. And in a third, the judge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] one, the judge allowed a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on a non-party in witness in Canada. In another, the decision was not so clearly wrong but was strange and confused. And in a third, the judge [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Curse of TracFone &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/25/tracfone-bitton/#comment-430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Curse of TracFone &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=4048#comment-430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] that I hope it does not get into the F. Supp.2d, so as to avoid misleading lawyers.&#8221; The second time, I wrote that &#8220;the decision, while maybe not as wrongheaded as the first decision, is muddled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] that I hope it does not get into the F. Supp.2d, so as to avoid misleading lawyers.&#8221; The second time, I wrote that &#8220;the decision, while maybe not as wrongheaded as the first decision, is muddled [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
