<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Belfast Project Live Blog	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/24/belfast-project-live-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/24/belfast-project-live-blog/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:01:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Belfast Project: High Court Rejects McIntyre&#8217;s Motion for an Injunction &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/24/belfast-project-live-blog/#comment-429</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belfast Project: High Court Rejects McIntyre&#8217;s Motion for an Injunction &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3846#comment-429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&#038;M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&#038;M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The First Circuit&#8217;s Belfast Project Decision: Analysis &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/24/belfast-project-live-blog/#comment-428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The First Circuit&#8217;s Belfast Project Decision: Analysis &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3846#comment-428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&#038;M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&#038;M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The First Circuit&#8217;s Belfast Project Decision: Analysis &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/24/belfast-project-live-blog/#comment-427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The First Circuit&#8217;s Belfast Project Decision: Analysis &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3846#comment-427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&#038;M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&amp;M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A Note on the April 4 Belfast Project Hearing &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/24/belfast-project-live-blog/#comment-426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Note on the April 4 Belfast Project Hearing &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3846#comment-426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Letters Blogatory liveblog of the hearing in the District Court on the government&#8217;s motion to dismiss The Moloney and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Letters Blogatory liveblog of the hearing in the District Court on the government&#8217;s motion to dismiss The Moloney and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Boston College: A glimpse of the archive&#8230; &#171; Slugger O&#039;Toole		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/24/belfast-project-live-blog/#comment-425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boston College: A glimpse of the archive&#8230; &#171; Slugger O&#039;Toole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3846#comment-425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Boston-based lawyer, Ted Folkman has been following the legal arguments.  And he&#8217;ll be live-blogging today&#8217;s hearing [7pm GMT - Added [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Boston-based lawyer, Ted Folkman has been following the legal arguments.  And he&#8217;ll be live-blogging today&#8217;s hearing [7pm GMT &#8211; Added [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
