https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/09/the-belfast-project-who-promised-confidentiality/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Mon, 03 Jul 2023 15:27:35 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/09/the-belfast-project-who-promised-confidentiality/#comment-383 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:08:48 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3806#comment-383 […] in the food fight between BC and Moloney & McIntyre about who made what promises to whom, there seems to be an interesting new nuance. Recall that there are two relevant contracts: one […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/09/the-belfast-project-who-promised-confidentiality/#comment-382 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:29:08 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3806#comment-382 […] began last May was substantially different. As the Boston-based lawyer Ted Folkman points out at Letters Blogatory :  ‘in its motion to quash the subpoena, Boston College did not suggest that the promise of […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/09/the-belfast-project-who-promised-confidentiality/#comment-381 Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:15:06 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3806#comment-381 Chris Bray commented on this post at the Boston College Subpoena blog. Comments aren’t open there, so I’ll comment here on his post. I think Chris got my post pretty much right, except that he omits what I think is an important point: even if the interviewees did not know that there was a risk of a subpoena, they should have known. So there is some blame that attaches to BC and to Moloney and McIntyre, but there is also some blame that attaches to the participants themselves, in my view.

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/09/the-belfast-project-who-promised-confidentiality/#comment-380 Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:55:29 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3806#comment-380 […] a smart, alert post at Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman notices Boston College wandering lost as officials there try to explain what promises were made to […]

]]>