<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Metso Minerals Industries v. Johnson Crushers International	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/06/metso-minerals-johnson-crushers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/06/metso-minerals-johnson-crushers/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Coloplast v. Generic Medical Devices &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/06/metso-minerals-johnson-crushers/#comment-24097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Coloplast v. Generic Medical Devices &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3583#comment-24097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the plaintiff invoking the Convention (though that point carries less weight in this case than in Metso, because here the question was not whether the plaintiff had to produce its own documents under the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the plaintiff invoking the Convention (though that point carries less weight in this case than in Metso, because here the question was not whether the plaintiff had to produce its own documents under the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Coloplast v. Generic Medical Devices &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/06/metso-minerals-johnson-crushers/#comment-365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Coloplast v. Generic Medical Devices &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3583#comment-365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the plaintiff invoking the Convention (though that point carries less weight in this case than in Metso, because here the question was not whether the plaintiff had to produce its own documents under the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the plaintiff invoking the Convention (though that point carries less weight in this case than in Metso, because here the question was not whether the plaintiff had to produce its own documents under the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
