<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Chevron Seeks Relief in the Second Circuit	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/05/chevron-motion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/05/chevron-motion/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:57:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Breaking News: Second Circuit Denys Chevron&#8217;s Motion For Relief &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/05/chevron-motion/#comment-372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breaking News: Second Circuit Denys Chevron&#8217;s Motion For Relief &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3738#comment-372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the Second Circuit denied Chevron&#8217;s motion for relief in a brief order, without opinion. In my post of January 5, 2011, I gave some substantive and procedural reasons for thinking that the motion should be denied. On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Second Circuit denied Chevron&#8217;s motion for relief in a brief order, without opinion. In my post of January 5, 2011, I gave some substantive and procedural reasons for thinking that the motion should be denied. On [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judge Kaplan Denies Chevron&#8217;s Motion or an Attachment &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2012/01/05/chevron-motion/#comment-371</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judge Kaplan Denies Chevron&#8217;s Motion or an Attachment &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3738#comment-371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] AttachmentBy Ted Folkman on January 6, 2012 in UncategorizedIn a little bit of an anticlimax after yesterday&#8217;s dramatic developments, there was some more good news for the Lago Agrio plaintiffs today. Judge Kaplan denied [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] AttachmentBy Ted Folkman on January 6, 2012 in UncategorizedIn a little bit of an anticlimax after yesterday&#8217;s dramatic developments, there was some more good news for the Lago Agrio plaintiffs today. Judge Kaplan denied [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
