<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Year In Review 1: Service By Email Under The Hague Service Convention	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/12/26/service-by-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/12/26/service-by-email/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 18:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Liberty Media Holdings v. Sheng Gan &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/12/26/service-by-email/#comment-23827</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Liberty Media Holdings v. Sheng Gan &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 18:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3179#comment-23827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Since Sheng Gan lived in Costa Rica, which is not a party to the Hague Service Convention, the reasons I have given for suggesting that the Convention does not permit service by email do not apply. (It&#8217;s [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Since Sheng Gan lived in Costa Rica, which is not a party to the Hague Service Convention, the reasons I have given for suggesting that the Convention does not permit service by email do not apply. (It&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Email and the Hague Service Convention Revisited &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/12/26/service-by-email/#comment-387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Email and the Hague Service Convention Revisited &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3179#comment-387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] a bunch of occasions I&#8217;ve But expressed my view that service by email is impermissible under the Hague Service Convention. By this I mean that you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a bunch of occasions I&#8217;ve But expressed my view that service by email is impermissible under the Hague Service Convention. By this I mean that you [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Facebook v. Banana Ads &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/12/26/service-by-email/#comment-386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Facebook v. Banana Ads &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3179#comment-386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] service by email is not prohibited by the Hague Service Convention. Clearly she had not read my end-of-the-year post on this question, which argues that service by email is not permissible under the Convention when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] service by email is not prohibited by the Hague Service Convention. Clearly she had not read my end-of-the-year post on this question, which argues that service by email is not permissible under the Convention when [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Liberty Media Holdings v. Sheng Gan &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/12/26/service-by-email/#comment-385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Liberty Media Holdings v. Sheng Gan &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=3179#comment-385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Since Sheng Gan lived in Costa Rica, which is not a party to the Hague Service Convention, the reasons I have given for suggesting that the Convention does not permit service by email do not apply. (It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Since Sheng Gan lived in Costa Rica, which is not a party to the Hague Service Convention, the reasons I have given for suggesting that the Convention does not permit service by email do not apply. (It&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
