<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: TracFone Wireless v. Doe	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracfone Case Rightly Decided &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-23349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracfone Case Rightly Decided &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 19:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2381#comment-23349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the Southern District of Florida in cases brought by Tracfone against various foreign defendants. In one, the judge allowed a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on a non-party in witness in Canada. In [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Southern District of Florida in cases brought by Tracfone against various foreign defendants. In one, the judge allowed a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on a non-party in witness in Canada. In [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracfone Case Rightly Decided &#124; &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-313</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracfone Case Rightly Decided &#124; &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2381#comment-313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the Southern District of Florida in cases brought by Tracfone against various foreign defendants. In one, the judge allowed a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on a non-party in witness in Canada. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Southern District of Florida in cases brought by Tracfone against various foreign defendants. In one, the judge allowed a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on a non-party in witness in Canada. In [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracfone Case Rightly Decided &#124; &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-314</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracfone Case Rightly Decided &#124; &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2381#comment-314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the Southern District of Florida in cases brought by Tracfone against various foreign defendants. In one, the judge allowed a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on a non-party in witness in Canada. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Southern District of Florida in cases brought by Tracfone against various foreign defendants. In one, the judge allowed a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on a non-party in witness in Canada. In [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Curse of TracFone &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Curse of TracFone &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2381#comment-312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] cow! TracFone is back in the Southern District of Florida. The first time we considered a TracFone case, I called the judge&#8217;s decision &#8220;one of those rare cases [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] cow! TracFone is back in the Southern District of Florida. The first time we considered a TracFone case, I called the judge&#8217;s decision &#8220;one of those rare cases [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Bitton &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-311</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Bitton &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2381#comment-311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] 2012 in Hague Service Convention, Service by email, Service by mailIn October 2011, we considered TracFone Wireless v. Doe (S.D. Fla. 2011), a decision I called &#8220;one of those rare cases that is so wrong that I hope it does not get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2012 in Hague Service Convention, Service by email, Service by mailIn October 2011, we considered TracFone Wireless v. Doe (S.D. Fla. 2011), a decision I called &#8220;one of those rare cases that is so wrong that I hope it does not get [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2381#comment-310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-309&quot;&gt;Antonin I. Pribetic&lt;/a&gt;.


&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;As you point out, the plaintiff should have obtained letters rogatory (letter of request) instead, or and alternative service at one of the many TD branches in Miami.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Right, except service at a branch in Miami wouldn&#039;t have been &quot;alternative service.&quot; It&#039;s simply the ordinary way you serve a big national (or international) bank. If I want records from Bank of America, I send a subpoena to its main office in Boston; I don&#039;t bother with a commission and subpoena in North Carolina!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-309">Antonin I. Pribetic</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;As you point out, the plaintiff should have obtained letters rogatory (letter of request) instead, or and alternative service at one of the many TD branches in Miami.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Right, except service at a branch in Miami wouldn&#8217;t have been &#8220;alternative service.&#8221; It&#8217;s simply the ordinary way you serve a big national (or international) bank. If I want records from Bank of America, I send a subpoena to its main office in Boston; I don&#8217;t bother with a commission and subpoena in North Carolina!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Antonin I. Pribetic		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/13/tracfone-wireless/#comment-309</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonin I. Pribetic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2381#comment-309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent post. How the plaintiff will enforce the Florida court&#039;s order permitting service of the subpoena and production of TD Bank&#039;s records in Canada is the ultimate question. The Supreme Court of Canada in Pro Swing Inc. v. Elta Golf Inc. held that non-monetary foreign judgments (declaratory, injunctive) may now be enforced in Canada. However, the preferred procedural route is by letters rogatory. As you point out, the plaintiff should have obtained letters rogatory (letter of request) instead, or and alternative service at one of the many TD branches in Miami.

Parenthetically, under the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, service of a subpoena (summons to witness) on either an Ontario resident or by inter-provincial subpoena, must be made personally and not by an alternative to personal service, such as regular mail, international registered mail, email or fax.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post. How the plaintiff will enforce the Florida court&#8217;s order permitting service of the subpoena and production of TD Bank&#8217;s records in Canada is the ultimate question. The Supreme Court of Canada in Pro Swing Inc. v. Elta Golf Inc. held that non-monetary foreign judgments (declaratory, injunctive) may now be enforced in Canada. However, the preferred procedural route is by letters rogatory. As you point out, the plaintiff should have obtained letters rogatory (letter of request) instead, or and alternative service at one of the many TD branches in Miami.</p>
<p>Parenthetically, under the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, service of a subpoena (summons to witness) on either an Ontario resident or by inter-provincial subpoena, must be made personally and not by an alternative to personal service, such as regular mail, international registered mail, email or fax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
