<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Bleier v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/#comment-308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2322#comment-308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/#comment-307&quot;&gt;Steve&lt;/a&gt;.

Steve, if I understand your question, you&#039;re asking how one could go about enforcing a judgment against Germany, assuming that the plaintiff ultimately gets a judgment. I&#039;m assuming that this is an academic question and that you&#039;re not looking for legal advice about any particular case.

In general, US judgments for money damages are enforced in the United States by writ of execution, but when the judgment debtor is a foreign sovereign, the FSIA makes foreign sovereign property generally immune from execution, with exceptions. You may want to look at 28 U.S.C. &#167;&#167; 1609-1611 to get a basic sense of the rule. Of course, one could also seek recognition and enforcement of the US judgment in a foreign court, subject to the foreign country&#039;s laws, but I&#039;m not sure that that was your question.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/#comment-307">Steve</a>.</p>
<p>Steve, if I understand your question, you&#8217;re asking how one could go about enforcing a judgment against Germany, assuming that the plaintiff ultimately gets a judgment. I&#8217;m assuming that this is an academic question and that you&#8217;re not looking for legal advice about any particular case.</p>
<p>In general, US judgments for money damages are enforced in the United States by writ of execution, but when the judgment debtor is a foreign sovereign, the FSIA makes foreign sovereign property generally immune from execution, with exceptions. You may want to look at 28 U.S.C. &sect;&sect; 1609-1611 to get a basic sense of the rule. Of course, one could also seek recognition and enforcement of the US judgment in a foreign court, subject to the foreign country&#8217;s laws, but I&#8217;m not sure that that was your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/#comment-307</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2322#comment-307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If plaintiff is successful in service &#038; the bonds are validated, is Germany obligated to make payments on the bonds?  How can this be enforced?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If plaintiff is successful in service &amp; the bonds are validated, is Germany obligated to make payments on the bonds?  How can this be enforced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Stockdale		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/#comment-306</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Stockdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2322#comment-306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My book History&#039;s Greatest Fraud sheds light on this issue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My book History&#8217;s Greatest Fraud sheds light on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/#comment-305</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2322#comment-305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Louis M. Solomon has commented on &lt;em&gt;Sovereign Bonds Exchange LLC v. Federal Republic of Germany&lt;/em&gt;, another German pre-war bond case, at his blog. His post focuses on the need to follow the treaty provisions for validation of the bonds originating in what was West Germany, and it follows a Second Circuit decision holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to rule on bonds originating in the former East Germany.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis M. Solomon has commented on <em>Sovereign Bonds Exchange LLC v. Federal Republic of Germany</em>, another German pre-war bond case, at his blog. His post focuses on the need to follow the treaty provisions for validation of the bonds originating in what was West Germany, and it follows a Second Circuit decision holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to rule on bonds originating in the former East Germany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trent Tang		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/10/12/bleier-germany/#comment-304</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent Tang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2322#comment-304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d also direct everyone&#039;s attention to FRCvP 4, 1993 Advisory Committee Notes on subdivision (f), paragraph 5, which interprets Article 15 as authorizing alternative service.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also direct everyone&#8217;s attention to FRCvP 4, 1993 Advisory Committee Notes on subdivision (f), paragraph 5, which interprets Article 15 as authorizing alternative service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
