<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/27/case-of-the-day-h-d-michigan-llc-v-hellenic-duty-free-shops-s-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/27/case-of-the-day-h-d-michigan-llc-v-hellenic-duty-free-shops-s-a/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: H-D Michigan LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/27/case-of-the-day-h-d-michigan-llc-v-hellenic-duty-free-shops-s-a/#comment-23771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: H-D Michigan LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2179#comment-23771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] return today to the case of the day from September 27, 2011, H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A. The claim was for breach of a trademark [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] return today to the case of the day from September 27, 2011, H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A. The claim was for breach of a trademark [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: H-D Michigan v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/27/case-of-the-day-h-d-michigan-llc-v-hellenic-duty-free-shops-s-a/#comment-23288</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: H-D Michigan v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 03:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2179#comment-23288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops (7th Cir. 2012). We first saw this trademark licensing dispute on September 27, 2011, when the question was whether the judge could extend a temporary restraining order past the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops (7th Cir. 2012). We first saw this trademark licensing dispute on September 27, 2011, when the question was whether the judge could extend a temporary restraining order past the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Samsung Electronic Co. v. Early Bird Savings &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/27/case-of-the-day-h-d-michigan-llc-v-hellenic-duty-free-shops-s-a/#comment-22835</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Samsung Electronic Co. v. Early Bird Savings &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2179#comment-22835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of the TRO was justified. This decision is hard to square with the rule. In my post on the H-D Michigan case, I suggested that one answer is simply to hold the preliminary injunction hearing, as it may be [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of the TRO was justified. This decision is hard to square with the rule. In my post on the H-D Michigan case, I suggested that one answer is simply to hold the preliminary injunction hearing, as it may be [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Midmark Corp. v. Janak Healthcare &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/27/case-of-the-day-h-d-michigan-llc-v-hellenic-duty-free-shops-s-a/#comment-22791</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Midmark Corp. v. Janak Healthcare &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2179#comment-22791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] service of process is effected? I&#8217;ve dealt with this issue before, for example in my post on H-D Michigan v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops and in a post devoted to the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] service of process is effected? I&#8217;ve dealt with this issue before, for example in my post on H-D Michigan v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops and in a post devoted to the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: H-D Michigan LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/27/case-of-the-day-h-d-michigan-llc-v-hellenic-duty-free-shops-s-a/#comment-283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: H-D Michigan LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2179#comment-283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Father Of His Country&#8212;happy Presidents&#039; Day from Letters Blogatory!We return today to the case of the day from September 27, 2011, H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A. The claim was for breach of a trademark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Father Of His Country&mdash;happy Presidents&#039; Day from Letters Blogatory!We return today to the case of the day from September 27, 2011, H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A. The claim was for breach of a trademark [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: More on Preliminary Relief Before Service Of Process &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/27/case-of-the-day-h-d-michigan-llc-v-hellenic-duty-free-shops-s-a/#comment-282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on Preliminary Relief Before Service Of Process &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2179#comment-282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] 6, 2011 in Hague Service ConventionIn recent posts on 3M Co. v. Christian Investments LLC and H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty-Free Shops, S.A., I opined that given that courts have jurisdiction to enter temporary restraining orders binding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 6, 2011 in Hague Service ConventionIn recent posts on 3M Co. v. Christian Investments LLC and H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty-Free Shops, S.A., I opined that given that courts have jurisdiction to enter temporary restraining orders binding [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
