<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Breaking News: Second Circuit Vacates Chevron Preliminary Injunction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/21/breaking-news-second-circuit-vacates-chevron-preliminary-injunction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/21/breaking-news-second-circuit-vacates-chevron-preliminary-injunction/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 18:42:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ecuadoran Appeals Court Affirms Judgment Against Chevron &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/21/breaking-news-second-circuit-vacates-chevron-preliminary-injunction/#comment-288</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ecuadoran Appeals Court Affirms Judgment Against Chevron &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 18:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2144#comment-288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] may recall that the Ecuadoran plaintiffs stipulated that they would not begin proceedings to enforce the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] may recall that the Ecuadoran plaintiffs stipulated that they would not begin proceedings to enforce the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Breaking News: Second Circuit Denys Chevron&#8217;s Motion For Relief &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/21/breaking-news-second-circuit-vacates-chevron-preliminary-injunction/#comment-287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breaking News: Second Circuit Denys Chevron&#8217;s Motion For Relief &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2144#comment-287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] a clear hook for Chevron to seek what was, in effect, reconsideration of the Second Circuit&#8217;s earlier decision vacating Judge Kaplan&#8217;s injunction. On the substantive side, it didn&#8217;t seem oppressive to me to contemplate a judgment creditor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a clear hook for Chevron to seek what was, in effect, reconsideration of the Second Circuit&#8217;s earlier decision vacating Judge Kaplan&#8217;s injunction. On the substantive side, it didn&#8217;t seem oppressive to me to contemplate a judgment creditor [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judge Kaplan Denies Chevron&#8217;s Motion or an Attachment &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/21/breaking-news-second-circuit-vacates-chevron-preliminary-injunction/#comment-286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judge Kaplan Denies Chevron&#8217;s Motion or an Attachment &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2144#comment-286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] court had awarded (the RICO statute permits treble damages).As we know, the Second Circuit later vacated the injunction. And today, Judge Kaplan denied the request for an attachment on the grounds that whatever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] court had awarded (the RICO statute permits treble damages).As we know, the Second Circuit later vacated the injunction. And today, Judge Kaplan denied the request for an attachment on the grounds that whatever [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ecuadoran Appeals Court Affirms Judgment Against Chevron &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/21/breaking-news-second-circuit-vacates-chevron-preliminary-injunction/#comment-285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ecuadoran Appeals Court Affirms Judgment Against Chevron &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2144#comment-285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] issued a press release rejecting the decision. Opinio Juris has coverage, as does The Hill.Readers may recall that the Ecuadoran plaintiffs stipulated that they would not begin proceedings to enforce the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] issued a press release rejecting the decision. Opinio Juris has coverage, as does The Hill.Readers may recall that the Ecuadoran plaintiffs stipulated that they would not begin proceedings to enforce the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
