<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Developments in the Boston College Belfast Project Case	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:14:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Boston College: &#8220;No pledge of privacy nor oath of secrecy can avail against demand for the truth in a court of justice.&#8221; &#171; Slugger O&#039;Toole		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/#comment-276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boston College: &#8220;No pledge of privacy nor oath of secrecy can avail against demand for the truth in a court of justice.&#8221; &#171; Slugger O&#039;Toole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2061#comment-276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] As I predicted, the court rejected Moloney &#038; McIntyre’s arguments under the MLAT, because the treaty gives them no private right of action and because the Attorney General’s actions under the MLAT are not within the courts’ jursidiction. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As I predicted, the court rejected Moloney &amp; McIntyre’s arguments under the MLAT, because the treaty gives them no private right of action and because the Attorney General’s actions under the MLAT are not within the courts’ jursidiction. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BREAKING: First Circuit Rejects Moloney &#38; McIntyre&#8217;s Challenges in the Belfast Project Case &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/#comment-275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BREAKING: First Circuit Rejects Moloney &#38; McIntyre&#8217;s Challenges in the Belfast Project Case &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2061#comment-275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] As I predicted, the court rejected Moloney &#038; McIntyre&#8217;s arguments under the MLAT, because the treaty gives them no private right of action and because the Attorney General&#8217;s actions under the MLAT are not within the courts&#8217; jursidiction. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As I predicted, the court rejected Moloney &amp; McIntyre&#8217;s arguments under the MLAT, because the treaty gives them no private right of action and because the Attorney General&#8217;s actions under the MLAT are not within the courts&#8217; jursidiction. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judge Young Rules Against BC In The Project Belfast Case &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/#comment-274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judge Young Rules Against BC In The Project Belfast Case &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2061#comment-274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] to intervene. I&#8217;ve given my reasons for believing that they cannot make such a showing here and in later posts.If Boston College does appeal, then it&#8217;s a closer call, but in my view the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to intervene. I&#8217;ve given my reasons for believing that they cannot make such a showing here and in later posts.If Boston College does appeal, then it&#8217;s a closer call, but in my view the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Upcoming Belfast Project Hearing &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/#comment-273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Upcoming Belfast Project Hearing &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2061#comment-273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] think this claim will most likely fail. The arguments are straightforward, and I have made them before: Maloney and McIntyre probably lack standing; the decision whether to grant judicial assistance is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] think this claim will most likely fail. The arguments are straightforward, and I have made them before: Maloney and McIntyre probably lack standing; the decision whether to grant judicial assistance is [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Update on the Belfast Project Case: The Proposed Intervenors&#8217; New Brief &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/#comment-272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Update on the Belfast Project Case: The Proposed Intervenors&#8217; New Brief &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2061#comment-272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] McIntyre, have sought to intervene to challenge the subpoena. I covered their motion to intervene in my post of September 6. They want to assert a claim in the nature of mandamus, on the grounds that the Attorney General, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] McIntyre, have sought to intervene to challenge the subpoena. I covered their motion to intervene in my post of September 6. They want to assert a claim in the nature of mandamus, on the grounds that the Attorney General, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Belfast Project Update: The Government Opposes The Researchers&#8217; Motion to Intervene &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/#comment-271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belfast Project Update: The Government Opposes The Researchers&#8217; Motion to Intervene &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2061#comment-271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] not keep. Then two of the researchers involved with the Project, Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre, sought leave to intervene, arguing primarily that the Attorney General had not complied with the MLAT and also raising [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] not keep. Then two of the researchers involved with the Project, Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre, sought leave to intervene, arguing primarily that the Attorney General had not complied with the MLAT and also raising [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/09/06/developments-in-the-boston-college-belfast-project-case/#comment-270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=2061#comment-270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At John Carroll&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://campaignoutsider.com/2011/09/17/who-is-bcsubpoenanews-iii/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Campaign Outsider blog&lt;/a&gt;, we had a discussion that established that the Broken Elbow blog is a project of Anthony McIntyre&#039;s wife, though it seems that Mr. Moloney is somehow involved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At John Carroll&#8217;s <a href="http://campaignoutsider.com/2011/09/17/who-is-bcsubpoenanews-iii/" rel="nofollow ugc">Campaign Outsider blog</a>, we had a discussion that established that the Broken Elbow blog is a project of Anthony McIntyre&#8217;s wife, though it seems that Mr. Moloney is somehow involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
