<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People&#8217;s Democratic Republic	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/25/case-of-the-day-thai-lao-lignite-thailand-co-v-government-of-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/25/case-of-the-day-thai-lao-lignite-thailand-co-v-government-of-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:07:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/25/case-of-the-day-thai-lao-lignite-thailand-co-v-government-of-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic/#comment-23761</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1891#comment-23761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Democratic Republic (S.D.N.Y. 2012). We have reported on this dispute twice before. In the first post, the judge confirmed an arbitral award in favor of Thai-Lao against Laos. In the second, the judge [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Democratic Republic (S.D.N.Y. 2012). We have reported on this dispute twice before. In the first post, the judge confirmed an arbitral award in favor of Thai-Lao against Laos. In the second, the judge [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Kerajaan Republik Demokratik Rakyat Laos v. Hongsa Lingitwe Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/25/case-of-the-day-thai-lao-lignite-thailand-co-v-government-of-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic/#comment-23275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Kerajaan Republik Demokratik Rakyat Laos v. Hongsa Lingitwe Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1891#comment-23275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Letters Blogatory wishes its readers a happy Martin Luther King Day!I have an update on the Thai-Lao Lignite case today. Here is my description of the case from a prior post: [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Letters Blogatory wishes its readers a happy Martin Luther King Day!I have an update on the Thai-Lao Lignite case today. Here is my description of the case from a prior post: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite Co. v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/25/case-of-the-day-thai-lao-lignite-thailand-co-v-government-of-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic/#comment-22834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite Co. v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1891#comment-22834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] sought and received confirmation of the award in 2011. The judge rejected Laos&#8217;s argument that the dispute was [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] sought and received confirmation of the award in 2011. The judge rejected Laos&#8217;s argument that the dispute was [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/25/case-of-the-day-thai-lao-lignite-thailand-co-v-government-of-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic/#comment-262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1891#comment-262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] of the Lao People&#8217;s Democratic Republic (2d Cir. 2012). We first saw the case in my post of August 25, 2011. I have also reported on two related cases under &#167; 1782, one a request for judicial assistance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of the Lao People&#8217;s Democratic Republic (2d Cir. 2012). We first saw the case in my post of August 25, 2011. I have also reported on two related cases under &sect; 1782, one a request for judicial assistance [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/25/case-of-the-day-thai-lao-lignite-thailand-co-v-government-of-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic/#comment-261</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Thai-Lao Lignite v. Laos &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1891#comment-261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Democratic Republic (S.D.N.Y. 2012). We have reported on this dispute twice before. In the first post, the judge confirmed an arbitral award in favor of Thai-Lao against Laos. In the second, the judge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Democratic Republic (S.D.N.Y. 2012). We have reported on this dispute twice before. In the first post, the judge confirmed an arbitral award in favor of Thai-Lao against Laos. In the second, the judge [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Application of Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/25/case-of-the-day-thai-lao-lignite-thailand-co-v-government-of-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic/#comment-260</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Application of Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1891#comment-260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] (Thailand) Co.By Ted Folkman on November 3, 2011 in Judicial Assistance StatuteWe reported on Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (S.D.N.Y. 20... back in August. In the prior case, the court confirmed an arbitral award in favor of Thai-Lao [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Thailand) Co.By Ted Folkman on November 3, 2011 in Judicial Assistance StatuteWe reported on Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (S.D.N.Y. 20&#8230; back in August. In the prior case, the court confirmed an arbitral award in favor of Thai-Lao [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
