<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Qi	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/17/tiffany-qi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/17/tiffany-qi/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:09:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Gucci America v. Li &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/17/tiffany-qi/#comment-24098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Gucci America v. Li &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1774#comment-24098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. Li (S.D.N.Y. 2011), reprises the issues confronted in Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Qi, 276 F.R.D. 143 (S.D.N.Y. 2011),the case of the day from August 17, 2011. Gucci and its affiliates sued Weixing Li, Lijun Xu, Ting [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. Li (S.D.N.Y. 2011), reprises the issues confronted in Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Qi, 276 F.R.D. 143 (S.D.N.Y. 2011),the case of the day from August 17, 2011. Gucci and its affiliates sued Weixing Li, Lijun Xu, Ting [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Wultz v. Bank of China &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/17/tiffany-qi/#comment-23280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Wultz v. Bank of China &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1774#comment-23280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Convention rather than the FRCP. The judge undertook this analysis in the shadow of cases such as Tiffany v. Qi, in which the court ordered the Bank of China to produce documents under the FRCP over a claim that [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Convention rather than the FRCP. The judge undertook this analysis in the shadow of cases such as Tiffany v. Qi, in which the court ordered the Bank of China to produce documents under the FRCP over a claim that [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Gucci America v. Li &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/17/tiffany-qi/#comment-241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Gucci America v. Li &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1774#comment-241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. Li (S.D.N.Y. 2011), reprises the issues confronted in Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Qi, 276 F.R.D. 143 (S.D.N.Y. 2011),the case of the day from August 17, 2011. Gucci and its affiliates sued Weixing Li, Lijun Xu, Ting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. Li (S.D.N.Y. 2011), reprises the issues confronted in Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Qi, 276 F.R.D. 143 (S.D.N.Y. 2011),the case of the day from August 17, 2011. Gucci and its affiliates sued Weixing Li, Lijun Xu, Ting [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
