<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Republic of Ecuador v. Bjorkman	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/16/case-of-the-day-republic-of-ecuador-v-bjorkman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/16/case-of-the-day-republic-of-ecuador-v-bjorkman/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:10:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: We&#039;re Back! Case of the Day: In re Application of Gushlak &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/16/case-of-the-day-republic-of-ecuador-v-bjorkman/#comment-24156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[We&#039;re Back! Case of the Day: In re Application of Gushlak &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1860#comment-24156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the warden was, in effect, an application against the United States. As noted in the post on Republic of Ecuador v. Bjorkman, the case of the day form August 16, 2011, the United States is not a &#8220;person&#8221; under § [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the warden was, in effect, an application against the United States. As noted in the post on Republic of Ecuador v. Bjorkman, the case of the day form August 16, 2011, the United States is not a &#8220;person&#8221; under § [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Application of Kazakhstan &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/16/case-of-the-day-republic-of-ecuador-v-bjorkman/#comment-22762</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Application of Kazakhstan &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1860#comment-22762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] was not a &#8220;person&#8221; for the purposes of the Due Process Clause. Anyway, as I noted in my post on the Bjorkman case, and as Judge Chen discussed in the decision Judge Stein cited, it&#8217;s clear that foreign [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was not a &#8220;person&#8221; for the purposes of the Due Process Clause. Anyway, as I noted in my post on the Bjorkman case, and as Judge Chen discussed in the decision Judge Stein cited, it&#8217;s clear that foreign [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Government of Ghana v. ProEnergy Services, LLC &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/16/case-of-the-day-republic-of-ecuador-v-bjorkman/#comment-256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Government of Ghana v. ProEnergy Services, LLC &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1860#comment-256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] I think it&#8217;s not crucial to the outcome. &#8617;My most detailed post about this issue was my post on Republic of Ecuador v. Bjorkman, one of the &#167; 1782 proceedings Chevron brought in the Lago Agrio affair, though I also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I think it&#8217;s not crucial to the outcome. &#8617;My most detailed post about this issue was my post on Republic of Ecuador v. Bjorkman, one of the &sect; 1782 proceedings Chevron brought in the Lago Agrio affair, though I also [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: We&#8217;re Back! Case of the Day: In re Application of Gushlak &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/16/case-of-the-day-republic-of-ecuador-v-bjorkman/#comment-255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[We&#8217;re Back! Case of the Day: In re Application of Gushlak &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 03:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1860#comment-255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the warden was, in effect, an application against the United States. As noted in the post on Republic of Ecuador v. Bjorkman, the case of the day form August 16, 2011, the United States is not a &#8220;person&#8221; under § [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the warden was, in effect, an application against the United States. As noted in the post on Republic of Ecuador v. Bjorkman, the case of the day form August 16, 2011, the United States is not a &#8220;person&#8221; under § [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/08/16/case-of-the-day-republic-of-ecuador-v-bjorkman/#comment-254</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1860#comment-254</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The judge adopted the magistrate judge&#039;s recommendation on Nov. 9.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The judge adopted the magistrate judge&#8217;s recommendation on Nov. 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
