<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: InvestorsHub.com v. Mina Mar Group	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/07/15/case-of-the-day-investorshub-com-v-mina-mar-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/07/15/case-of-the-day-investorshub-com-v-mina-mar-group/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:20:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ecuadoran Court Denies Chevron&#8217;s Motion for Clarification &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/07/15/case-of-the-day-investorshub-com-v-mina-mar-group/#comment-197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ecuadoran Court Denies Chevron&#8217;s Motion for Clarification &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1640#comment-197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] unusual remedy. But it&#8217;s not clear that Ecuador, rather than the US, is the outlier here: in InvestorsHub.com v. Mina Mar Group, the case of the day from July 15, 2011, we saw a Canadian court in a defamation case order the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] unusual remedy. But it&#8217;s not clear that Ecuador, rather than the US, is the outlier here: in InvestorsHub.com v. Mina Mar Group, the case of the day from July 15, 2011, we saw a Canadian court in a defamation case order the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
